Digital Paint Discussion Board

Paintball 2: The Game => Paintball 2 Discussion => Topic started by: Silly on June 02, 2008, 09:29:15 PM

Title: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: Silly on June 02, 2008, 09:29:15 PM
Are they?

Do they show how good a player you are, or do they show how you cant work with a team. I get asked it a lot, and it bugs me. Someone will be pissed off at me and be like WANNA GO 1V1?!!. or "IF YOU LOOSE TO ME IN A 1V1 THEN UR NOT AS GOOD AS ME"

Is this true? i would just like some clarification. In my opinion, i think one versus ones are pointless and don't serve a purpose at all.
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: coLa on June 02, 2008, 10:11:04 PM
pointless. in this game it doesn't matter how good you are by yourself. what's more important is how well you play with a team. teams win games, not single players.
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: Sting on June 02, 2008, 10:15:32 PM
1vs1 shows some skill, but it doesn't show if you are a better player,
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: sk89q on June 02, 2008, 11:00:20 PM
There's more than one skill... yes?
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: Eiii on June 02, 2008, 11:31:49 PM
Rcon is %30 of team games. :(
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: Blitz on June 03, 2008, 01:56:03 AM
I would say it is far from pointless, but certainly does not factor in other team-based skills and factors. There are a lot of 1-on-1 'mini-confrontations' in a normal team game..
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: Cameron on June 03, 2008, 02:23:57 AM
1v1's are only for fun in my opinion.  Sometimes people take it seriously when i do 1v1 them but then I just leave if they do, its more for fun.  UNLESS its like a 1v1 tournament :).
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: Silly on June 03, 2008, 08:40:56 AM
I would say it is far from pointless, but certainly does not factor in other team-based skills and factors. There are a lot of 1-on-1 'mini-confrontations' in a normal team game..

i say blitz brings up a great point

Thanks man
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: Rick on June 05, 2008, 02:47:06 AM
In my opinion there just to have fun, but most of the time they arent :(
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: UnRateD on June 05, 2008, 03:02:00 AM
I reckon 1vs1 show how good you are whithout help. Theyre not really very important. and someone might play better with other popele so mite not do so great in 1vs1. It your opinion and how you find them relevant.
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: i_am_a_pirate on June 05, 2008, 11:18:22 AM
Theproblem with 1-on-1s is that if ou find a place where you can see alot of the map, if you see something move, you KNOW that it is the enemy. In the same way, if you see something and start to follow it back to your base, then you KNOW that you can't be killed unless he turns around. This is particularly annoying in elimination as the only onjective is to seek and destroy, if, say, in jump you go opposite ways, then it will take FOREVER to win the match.
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: UnRateD on June 05, 2008, 11:28:48 AM
"Theproblem with 1-on-1s is that if ou find a place where you can see alot of the map, if you see something move, you KNOW that it is the enemy. In the same way, if you see something and start to follow it back to your base, then you KNOW that you can't be killed unless he turns around. This is particularly annoying in elimination as the only onjective is to seek and destroy, if, say, in jump you go opposite ways, then it will take FOREVER to win the match."

Thsi rule applies in normal games as well becasue if someone is moving, then its probably your enemy (also you can tell by the colour)
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: i_am_a_pirate on June 09, 2008, 01:58:50 PM
yes, but if you're folllowing them, then you don't need to cover your back as you know that there is no one else.

Also, there is a quote button: use it
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: UnRateD on June 09, 2008, 02:35:26 PM
lol i use the quick reply soz. at the end of the day its your opinion. if u wanna count them as important, do so. if not then oh well.
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: y00tz on June 09, 2008, 02:55:46 PM
lol i use the quick reply soz.

There's still a quote button.
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: iced on June 11, 2008, 05:20:29 PM
pointless and a waste of time
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: theSYNDIKATE on June 13, 2008, 10:12:50 AM
10 year old kid: "Hey Syn 1v1?"

Me: "No, thanks."

10 year old kid: "Why?"

Me: "Cause I've got better things to do."

10 year old kid: "haha, you scared of losing?"

Me: "¬_¬"

10 year old kid: "Noob haha!!!!!!!11one11one"

*10 year old kid disconnects*

Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: UnRateD on June 13, 2008, 03:51:40 PM
10 year old kid: "Hey Syn 1v1?"

Me: "No, thanks."

10 year old kid: "Why?"

Me: "Cause I've got better things to do."

10 year old kid: "haha, you scared of losing?"

Me: "¬_¬"

10 year old kid: "Noob haha!!!!!!!11one11one"

*10 year old kid disconnects*



*edit 9 year old.

that is really annoying. usually theyre not even that good.

"OMG YOURE A NOOB FOR NOT WANTING TO PLAY ME ON A 1VS1 LMAO AT YOU NOOB" be quiet.
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: theSYNDIKATE on June 16, 2008, 02:24:52 PM
*edit 9 year old.

that is really annoying. usually theyre not even that good.

"OMG YOURE A NOOB FOR NOT WANTING TO PLAY ME ON A 1VS1 LMAO AT YOU NOOB" be quiet.

Yeah, they really need a personal mute/vote mute function in this game
Title: _
Post by: P!nk on June 16, 2008, 02:42:36 PM
Post removed
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: UnRateD on June 16, 2008, 03:48:13 PM
so there already is a mute thing. good good now i can have a peaceful game uninterrupted by a bunch of 10 year olds wnaitng 1vs1s. gdgd.
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: theSYNDIKATE on June 17, 2008, 12:02:02 PM
Ah I forgot about the ignore, but a server-side mute where no one can see what they type at all would be neat
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: iced on June 18, 2008, 02:41:39 AM
10 year old kid: "Hey Syn 1v1?"

Me: "No, thanks."

10 year old kid: "Why?"

Me: "Cause I've got better things to do."

10 year old kid: "haha, you scared of losing?"

Me: "¬_¬"

10 year old kid: "Noob haha!!!!!!!11one11one"

*10 year old kid disconnects*



^ basically sums it up. 'nuff sed.
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: Apocalypse on June 18, 2008, 04:31:50 PM
Code: [Select]
bind "l" "ignore all"That code is my best friend.
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: bucky on June 27, 2008, 02:36:29 PM
in my opinion 1v1's are dumb unless you know who youre playing and you are just messing around especially when you 1v1 somebody and they pick a map youve never played before then you figure out the map halfway through the game and youre already down 25-30 to not even 5 thats not cool....
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: Spook on June 27, 2008, 03:53:15 PM
I love 1v1's just because they make the other person feel bad when they lose.
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: Laged on June 27, 2008, 04:11:31 PM
Evil spook  >:(
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: iced on June 28, 2008, 01:20:07 PM
unless ur on the other end of it spook :o
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: Spook on June 28, 2008, 01:34:19 PM
Hah.
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: eradicator on June 28, 2008, 07:52:47 PM
Spook has the best aim I think I've ever seen, I'm sure hes rarely on "the other end of it".
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: coLa on June 28, 2008, 09:40:22 PM
so rude to joke around like that. you could really hurt somebodies feelings.
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: Olbaid on June 28, 2008, 09:51:04 PM
Spook has the best aim I think I've ever seen, I'm sure hes rarely on "the other end of it".

Thanks for the laugh.  Almost made me choke on my drink.
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: Spook on June 28, 2008, 10:04:41 PM
Thanks for the laugh.  Almost made me choke on my drink.
*snaps finger* darn... "almost."

We'll get that prick next time, erad. =]
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: eradicator on June 28, 2008, 10:23:29 PM
The anthrax should arrive any day now...
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: Olbaid on June 29, 2008, 03:56:17 PM
Personal threat and name-calling.  Something needs to be done, or I'm not sure if I can check the forums anymore for my own safety.  Stop harshing me please.
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: coLa on June 29, 2008, 07:30:30 PM
lmfao.
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: iced on June 30, 2008, 12:17:16 AM
Spook has the best aim I think I've ever seen, I'm sure hes rarely on "the other end of it".

it was a joke...duh
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: wallpainter08 on June 30, 2008, 09:01:36 AM
1 vs 1 is good for fun and also it is "kinda" good for new players.  This way they can get to at least look at the map a little...before they take some paint to the face (for ex. a team game you have a better chance of getting shot).

And when I know sometimes people (even in different clans) sometimes teach people new tricks if they are losing really badly.  But 1 vs 1 is not a way to prove if your clan is better than someone elses or especially prove if your better than someone.

All it shows is you can either line really good or can cap really fast on a new players.
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: theSYNDIKATE on July 01, 2008, 02:06:24 AM
IMO the only time to 1v1 another player is when you're facing a player with more experience than you (as long as they aren't one of them know-it-all ego driven fools who think they own the game and everyone in it.) This is a good way to get better,  cause facing random nubs by server hopping that you already know you'll mop the floor with won't help you develop skill or give you any pleasure.
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: Homingbullet on July 01, 2008, 10:24:08 PM
had a newb come into a pub and ask everyone for a 1v1 saying he'll raped everybody kinda made me mad. raped em with pgp. to many darn newbs in the game who think there some kind of pros.1v1 don't really prove anything. Teamwork is what gets it done. "Recon"
Title: Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
Post by: UnRateD on July 02, 2008, 12:40:41 PM
had a newb come into a pub and ask everyone for a 1v1 saying he'll raped everybody kinda made me mad. raped em with pgp. to many darn newbs in the game who think there some kind of pros.1v1 don't really prove anything. Teamwork is what gets it done. "Recon"

RECON TIME !!
to the newbs, it makes them feel big when they win. theyre new to the game so they probs dont really know much about how 1vs1 are not as important as 2+vs2+ etc. but thats their opinion and even if it is completely wrong, should be respected.

slightly.

kind of.