Digital Paint Discussion Board

Fairness Enforcement => Issues for Committee Review => Topic started by: rockitude on July 25, 2011, 11:34:54 AM

Title: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: rockitude on July 25, 2011, 11:34:54 AM
Committee pls check this demo, that was recorded on oXz Public 17:30 GMT+1. So many obvious shots.
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: prozajik on July 25, 2011, 11:39:32 AM
agree with spain and adding my demo same map but maybe i chased few more shots then in spains demo
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: s0ny on July 25, 2011, 11:44:55 AM
look so obvious!
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: STeam on July 25, 2011, 11:49:55 AM
Committee pls check this demo, that was recorded on oXz Public 17:30 GMT+1. So many obvious shots.
same opinion, much obvious..
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: pvtjimmy on July 25, 2011, 11:53:01 AM
I see lots of rage, but no-one actually posting some times which are suposed to be suspicious
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: prozajik on July 25, 2011, 12:17:19 PM
in my demo
16:50
16:30
from 16:10 he just knew that no one is bshoting him, with this ping i would spray on hill
14:20
13:08
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: Morphin on July 25, 2011, 12:23:13 PM
I had to laugh at the scene where he stood under speedjump boxes and waited for the  red guy  :DDDD lmao
I think some americans will get banned next days ; )
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: pvtjimmy on July 25, 2011, 12:34:30 PM
After checking spains demo I see no reason to suspect him of wallhacking? All shots are explainable with a little luck and movement sounds. Forgive me when my judgement here is wrong.


-edit-
I've earned something about Myres multi. Is it true or?

1) learn English
2) *click* (http://dplogin.com/forums/index.php?action=search)
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: flamer on July 25, 2011, 05:14:34 PM
Looks Obvious i'd say. Especially at the point when Sindy is high at the ramp and Chemical keeps lining at her non stop.
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: idias on July 25, 2011, 07:08:25 PM
him*
It's a dude.

Doesn't look like wallhacks to me... Some pretty odd moments but Vanity pays a lot of attention to sounds. If you wanna ban something, ban his headset.
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: Rick on July 26, 2011, 05:24:57 AM
eh, some things did seem a little 'iffy'. All could be explained if a demo was supplied by Chemical.
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: dd9 on July 26, 2011, 05:32:13 AM
Lol it is sure, i thought he is good, ban him nub
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: gath on July 26, 2011, 07:12:23 AM
it seems to be a wh
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: Riddick on July 26, 2011, 07:46:43 AM
you cant ban anyone based off such inferior evidence. going off of precedent if shockwave wasnt banned for his 99.9% obvious wallhacks that jusu pointed out to his in the biggest hacking demo ive ever seen then you cant even attempt to ban chemical on what was probaby just a couple flukes. i mean lets face it... hes bad.
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: idias on July 26, 2011, 11:02:20 AM
dd9, not trying to offend anyone but this demo is just as suspicious as some I've seen from you, like some I've seen from prozajik,  and I know you guys are not hacking. Not to mention shk's blatant demo... Doesn't necessarily mean you guys are wallhacking.

Many people have many suspicious moments... Sometimes I decide to look around a corner I usually don't look at and find someone there, that just happens. Vanity knows the map well and pays a lot of attention to sound and stuff. Honestly, I don't think it's wallhack.
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: dd9 on July 27, 2011, 07:30:06 AM
i know... well, if this is not wh, so he is rlly very good
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: prozajik on July 27, 2011, 08:46:44 AM
Doesn't look like wallhacks to me... Some pretty odd moments but Vanity pays a lot of attention to sounds....
He had 230 ping or so. I dont think sound can be that precious with ping like this. And shots he is able to perfom... maybe if he had ping 60 i would accept sound orientation but not with this ping. With this ping it seems pretty obvious to me. But still its just my opinion
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: Riddick on July 27, 2011, 12:40:53 PM
sorry to burst that bubble of yours but ping doesnt effect sound.
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: CheMiCal on July 27, 2011, 04:08:33 PM
all i can say is get tritton AX pro's and you'll know what i'm talking about. they cost about 300$ now so GG.
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: coledamm on July 27, 2011, 05:43:47 PM
dont lie chem, you still got prize as headphones from globalgamers league
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: CheMiCal on July 27, 2011, 05:53:40 PM
i still have it but i only 1 side works other headphone blewout. now i use these

http://www.trittonusa.com/index.php/products/gaming_audio_technology/ax-pro/
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: Paint.clown on July 28, 2011, 01:32:50 PM
Those look Nice and Comfortable
Title: Re: Chemical Wallhack
Post by: coLa on July 29, 2011, 09:46:35 PM
That headset is $89 at COmpUSA