do you think botanic_b1 looks good? Same for azur and brokendojo (broken has too high wpoly too). All are blocky maps that are lookwise not that great compared to other maps.
to answer your question, no i don't think either botanic, azur or brokendojo looks good. Mapping takes time and trials, probably any decent mapper went through phases of producing lots of first maps which weren't great, but they slowly progressed. I'm not sure what you are trying to tell with that quote:
A lot of maps have been created in a time, when PCs were far more limited than nowadays. That's why many currently popular maps are geometrically more spartanic than necessary, have bad lighting etc
Because i also disagree with what is said in there and i don't see the link between what is said in the quote and the map comparison you made.
Concerning the overwrite of map-names i also strongly disapprove the usage and will tell any server hoster that i know to absolutely not do it.
We have many maps that are better than their remake version and that's enough reason to never overwrite any map. If you are a server hoster and you overwrite map names, you are making a big mistake. Just making this clear.
What i am approving in this post is the promotion of map remakes. As long as it's done fair & square:
- Diff namefile
- Almost no change to gameplay
- Better looking
I'm all for it.