Elimination Idea

[Chalk]

I think that once statistics get tracked, the most negative person each month should be perma-banned. It would build competition.

[Clipz]

I think that once statistics get tracked, the most negative person each month should be perma-banned. It would build competition.

So you want to get banned?

[LaZeRs]

Perma-banned is way too harsh. It's not like you went against the rules. You were just bad at the game.

[Ace]

Perma-banned is way too harsh. It's not like you went against the rules. You were just bad at the game.

Can't tell if you are being serious or not.

[Chalk]

Can't tell if you are being serious or not.

Poor performance is worse than wall hacking IMO. Wallhacking = cheat for winning |||| Bad play : cheat for losing. Just as bad, I say.

[FusSioN]

I'd rather not to create a global account than doing this...

[LaZeRs]

I'd go play a different game if it means I have a fat chance of getting banned for losing anyways...

[Clipz]

Maybe a one week ban from competitive play if that gets implemented.

[RoBiNandL!nk]

LOL, you actually posted this?

[Clipz]

LOL, you actually posted this?

I laughed when he said it last night on ts3 too because we all know he would be the one not playing!

[MyeRs]

I think that once statistics get tracked, the most negative person each month should be perma-banned. It would build competition.

I agree, this forces people who suck to uninstall the game, which in turn improves game.

People who suck = cheat for losing = most accurate statement I've ever seen.

[UnRateD]

what a ludicrous request, please refrain from stupid posts.