Author Topic: --> 666 <--  (Read 2335 times)

bitmate

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1248
--> 666 <--
« on: October 20, 2006, 09:13:04 AM »
* bitmate is evil!


IronFist

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1304
_
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2006, 09:28:23 AM »
Post removed
« Last Edit: July 25, 2010, 10:35:36 PM by IronFist »

bitmate

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1248
Re: --> 666 <--
« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2006, 12:28:08 PM »
Unfortunately, I'm more that evil now :'( .
But I hope I'm still protected.

TinMan

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1347
Re: --> 666 <--
« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2006, 02:33:53 PM »
Funny thing that 666 is a sacred number in many religions, and then some protestants claimed that its the number of the beast because pope Vicarius Filii Dei's name in Roman numerals adds up to 666. (VICIVILIIDI)
I like how Hollywood has Christians using it as a sign of evil now too.

People need to read up on symbology and iconography before they try to use icons that they have no idea the meaning of.

Smokey

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1172
Re: --> 666 <--
« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2006, 03:14:47 PM »
why was my post deleted..this is clearly a non-serious thread...?

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: --> 666 <--
« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2006, 03:36:07 PM »
Because "!LOL!" posts aren't worth reading even in non-serious discussion.

loial21

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2807
Re: --> 666 <--
« Reply #6 on: October 20, 2006, 10:09:52 PM »
666 is a complete mathematical mockery of the trinity not some catholic poop.



TinMan

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1347
Re: --> 666 <--
« Reply #7 on: October 20, 2006, 10:51:26 PM »
To me its mathematical use is sacred, a mockery of nothing, as it is in some other religions too. Many icons that are sacred to some are spit on by others, such as the swastika, suwastika, pentacle, the sunwheel, fylfot, sowilo, etc... I blame the Nazis for giving most of these a second meaning which is bad, the rest can be blamed on religions seeking dominance by making other religions look evil.

666 is an abundant number. It is the sum of the first 36 natural numbers (i.e. 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + 34 + 35 + 36 = 666), and thus a triangular number, and the sum of the squares of the first seven prime numbers (i.e. 22 + 32 + 52 + 72 + 112 + 132 + 172 = 666).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/666_%28number%29

Excalibur

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 492
Re: --> 666 <--
« Reply #8 on: October 21, 2006, 12:46:10 AM »
they have found evidence. that when the bible was written the old scrolls did not say 666 but somthing more like 686.

loial21

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2807
Re: --> 666 <--
« Reply #9 on: October 21, 2006, 06:01:22 AM »
I got wiki(ed).  ;D Sweet!

To you. Sure.

To others. Perhaps.

To all. Death.

Why?

Because Jesus and Hiroshima told me so!

Sorry old pal I had to mention your name in that song. We cool lord? Sweet! You are an awesome god. To me. Now I can walk around with out the weight of the world on me because it was lifted off because I am forgiven now of the pressure I put on my self for having being raised with parents who taught me by example ethics, manorisms, morals.


Until we become hungry. We will always become more work.


Then it was man vs man vs beast vs nature (21 phases of matter, oh how ironic the number) vs man vs himself. Which is signified in the equation 1 + 1 + 6 + 21+ 1 + 1= 31. Do you have any idea what this number symbolizes! Look at the star from David. They have nothing in common except Uranus and my intrest.

"Death is light as a feather and duty is heavy as a mountain"
 
Logically speaking religion is speculative at best. Ironically we Humans are not all 100% logical or accurate when it comes to speculating about the unknown.





TinMan

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1347
Re: --> 666 <--
« Reply #10 on: October 21, 2006, 07:21:31 AM »
Haha, nice. We should have a thread of solid mythology, ideology, and philosophy. :P

loial21

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2807
Re: --> 666 <--
« Reply #11 on: October 21, 2006, 08:37:06 AM »
I would rather have one about Respect.  :-[+ :-*= ;D


P!nk

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 948
_
« Reply #12 on: October 21, 2006, 10:48:00 AM »
Post removed
« Last Edit: July 26, 2010, 02:26:39 AM by P!nk »

Eiii

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 4595
Re: --> 666 <--
« Reply #13 on: October 21, 2006, 12:07:44 PM »
Embarrassed + sexually promiscuous person = Suspicious smile?

loial21

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2807
Re: --> 666 <--
« Reply #14 on: October 21, 2006, 12:32:28 PM »
Pink,
No added respect. You silly. 


Eiii ahem,

Embarrassed yes.  Wanting the forum to involve its self in an important discussion regarding respect.

+

Showing affection (in a non sexual way you perv) to the readers.

=

Really enthusiastic Loial waits for a topic about respect.


I guess extra words aka 'fluff' were needed to help you put into context my smiley message.

Go ahead and start the new topic "The how to guide of having, showing, giving and losing respect." I will be right behi...flanking you.


Eiii

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 4595
Re: --> 666 <--
« Reply #15 on: October 21, 2006, 12:53:11 PM »
Eiii ahem,

Embarrassed yes.  Wanting the forum to involve its self in an important discussion regarding respect.

+

Showing affection (in a non sexual way you perv) to the readers.

=

Really enthusiastic Loial waits for a topic about respect.

Oh, of course. How could I have missed that?