Author Topic: Signatures  (Read 18167 times)

QueeNiE

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 435
Re: Signatures
« Reply #60 on: November 03, 2007, 03:01:47 PM »
So basically we don't have pictures in our signatures because some will look bad?



Oh my.


jitspoe me thinks you know what to do. 


And if you don't:

Add pictures back to signatures!

;)

y00tz

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2742
Re: Signatures
« Reply #61 on: November 03, 2007, 03:04:10 PM »
Makes it look prettier.

How does a conglomerate of poorly created picture signatures (See above) make the forum look prettier?

On a very serious note, I seriously can't wait until this forum is just smeared with picture signatures... there's nothing I love more than scrolling through the same pictures 20 times just to get to the content I want to read...

I love when a 15-year-old calls out people on the internet, because they think their photoshop 'talent' is more amazing than whatever the hell the rest of the world produces...

QueeNiE

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 435
Re: Signatures
« Reply #62 on: November 03, 2007, 05:05:58 PM »
y00tz.


You can turn off whether or not you see signatures.


Idiot.  Now I'm getting angry. 

People keep bringing up the same arguments, even AFTER the fact they I/others have proved ways to bypass them.

Seriously, think up something new to argue about and come back.

nightryder

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 448
Re: Signatures
« Reply #63 on: November 03, 2007, 05:08:12 PM »
what if jitspoe doesnt want it on his forums?!?!?!?

bypass that....

;)

P!nk

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 948
Re: Signatures
« Reply #64 on: November 03, 2007, 05:08:31 PM »
Idiot.

Edit it, he can use it as an excuse to ban you.

what if jitspoe doesnt want it on his forums?!?!?!?

bypass that....

;)

That's possible, he has given his reasons for not wanting it, and we have given our best solutions to what he sees as problems.

I really don't know why I'm still in here, lol. :D

Eiii

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 4595
Re: Signatures
« Reply #65 on: November 03, 2007, 05:11:53 PM »
Idiot.  Now I'm getting angry.

Hulk smash?

Fullmetal_Steeb

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 353
Re: Signatures
« Reply #66 on: November 03, 2007, 05:20:34 PM »
I love when a 15-year-old calls out people on the internet, because they think their photoshop 'talent' is more amazing than whatever the hell the rest of the world produces...
I suck at photoshop. :D I'm the world's only 15 year old who doesn't do that aforementioned stuff!

QueeNiE

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 435
Re: Signatures
« Reply #67 on: November 03, 2007, 05:46:35 PM »
I'll give jitspoe thirteen pretty flowers and a smooch.


He'll have to give in ;)

JpKool

  • Stingray
  • Posts: 96
Re: Signatures
« Reply #68 on: November 03, 2007, 06:30:41 PM »
I wasn't necessarily talking about yours. I was talking about the inevitable flood of crappy sigs that would follow. Also, I just might have to take you up on that photoshop thing.

And your saying what??? Wernt we all bad at something at one point?? this is one way to bring everyone closer in the community to talk about something new comment and give advie on things. why not if u dont like im dont let em show its as easy as that.


QueeNiE

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 435
Re: Signatures
« Reply #69 on: November 03, 2007, 06:31:55 PM »
Ew.  ^^


Brushing and copy + paste. :D

Eiii would be proud ;)



Jay Kay!


You have a valid point.

JpKool

  • Stingray
  • Posts: 96
Re: Signatures
« Reply #70 on: November 03, 2007, 06:32:54 PM »
hhhahahahahahaha

y00tz

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2742
Re: Signatures
« Reply #71 on: November 03, 2007, 06:33:30 PM »
Edit it, he can use it as an excuse to ban you.

Nah, I pretty much provoked that, and I apologize to you QueeNiE, and everyone else.  I stand by my point, but sarcasm wasn't the best route there.

Eiii

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 4595
Re: Signatures
« Reply #72 on: November 03, 2007, 06:33:56 PM »
this is one way to bring everyone closer in the community to talk about something new comment and give advie on things.
How about sodomy instead of signatures? That seems like something that'd bring the community closer together.

I don't really mind either way, as sigs are disabled for me. I just think it's a terrible idea.

QueeNiE

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 435
Re: Signatures
« Reply #73 on: November 03, 2007, 06:36:17 PM »



* QueeNiE bakes y00tz a pie and throws it at him

P!nk

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 948
Re: Signatures
« Reply #74 on: November 03, 2007, 06:42:47 PM »
How about sodomy instead of signatures? That seems like something that'd bring the community closer together.

How did Loial get into your brain? Is he using telepathic harassment now? :O

QueeNiE

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 435
Re: Signatures
« Reply #75 on: November 03, 2007, 06:46:51 PM »
He's been taking night classes in the art of telekinesis at the local barber shop.

P!nk

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 948
Re: Signatures
« Reply #76 on: November 03, 2007, 06:49:10 PM »
I see, were you taking them as well? That would explain the llama.

Fullmetal_Steeb

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 353
Re: Signatures
« Reply #77 on: November 03, 2007, 06:55:11 PM »
telekinesis
that would explain being able to throw stuff at you without touching it, not get into your mind ;)

QueeNiE

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 435
Re: Signatures
« Reply #78 on: November 03, 2007, 07:03:09 PM »
Oh, well, um



He learned both, OK? :{[[

Fullmetal_Steeb

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 353
Re: Signatures
« Reply #79 on: November 03, 2007, 07:15:22 PM »
:D That's what I thought.