Somebody can be interested at playing 1on1 where you have to rely only on your own experiences and your skills, and do not need a team recon, like me. On the other side, someone can be interested at playing in team game which is mostly established on very good team work... It depends at about ourselves.
But Viper has right, it is too hard to say, who is unambiguously "the best". For example: There are three players (A,B,C). Player A is generally the weakest, player B too much rely on his offense skills (which are very impressive) and player C is just good (he is good at defending and well know what offense mean but his offense is not so good like B, and he is mostly using brain when he playes)... So, player A is raped by offensive player B (no chance here), player B is raped by player C who playes really smart, and player C can be owned by player A because he is too self-confidence and playing style of player A make player C so nervous that he offen can not hit excrement... So that are my discoveries which I see quite offen, you can not say who is the best :-)
But my opinion is that player C should be the best;-)