Author Topic: Multiple Accounts: Ranger, Cordell, Zett (Read 9614 times)

jitspoe · « **on:** January 04, 2008, 08:32:50 PM »

45407   KodantCZ
5406   tanglung
34239   Hobit?_Bilbo>cz

Would be 8 days for admitting, but he requested a 64 day ban.

FlaMe · « **Reply #1 on:** January 04, 2008, 10:14:11 PM »

lmfao logs?

...i believe you, im just curious as to what the conversation was like

Ranger · « **Reply #2 on:** January 05, 2008, 03:39:09 AM »

Finally, I thought that you forgot ban me.
I wish to tell everybody that Iam not a real cheater but I wanted ban because I need a little break of this game, that is all:-) See you later,

-Walker

KiLo · « **Reply #3 on:** January 05, 2008, 03:59:19 AM »

As usual most worthless excuse ever.

Jackal · « **Reply #4 on:** January 05, 2008, 04:48:29 AM »

Quote from: Ranger on January 05, 2008, 03:39:09 AM

I need a little break of this game, that is all:-) See you later,

-Walker

i have the same idea =]

snoop · « **Reply #5 on:** January 05, 2008, 07:47:15 AM »

lol what an excuse....

Ranger · « **Reply #6 on:** January 05, 2008, 08:30:19 AM »

I dont care what are you people thinking about my "excuse". I just wanna say this: Im telling the truth, because I reported myself to jitspoe a few days ago and asked him for 64 days;-)

sk89q · « **Reply #7 on:** January 05, 2008, 03:28:58 PM »

Well you clearly cared if you posted in the first place.

eXitus · « **Reply #8 on:** August 18, 2008, 03:51:08 AM »

First Cordell played, then it said "login failed for exii|ranger" and "exii|ranger was kicked". Then Cordell entered the game again. Cordell did NOT disconnect before and came in later. Maybe Terrorist can check the ips? Happened on OTB Pub 1 about 11:40 GMT.

Screen:
http://img3.imagebanana.com/view/43sel7qb/ranger.JPG

IP: [13:44:58] RangerCZ connected [90.183.57.98:5653]

Thanks at Ic3y for the Ip

Ranger · « **Reply #9 on:** August 18, 2008, 06:24:17 AM »

Some problem here? Nobody here can say It was me.. I have 1 brother and 2 sisters, they could play on that computer, or ... Are you able to prove opposite?? :-)

flip · « **Reply #10 on:** August 19, 2008, 04:20:46 PM »

Not to accuse anyone... but here's my take.

Quote from: Ranger on August 18, 2008, 06:24:17 AM

Some problem here? Nobody here can say It was me.. I have 1 brother and 2 sisters, they could play on that computer, or ... Are you able to prove opposite?? :-)

Most people who are innocent of a crime automatically screams how they are innocent and are most often than not fairly confused about how they could be accused of said crime. When a person states from the beginning "Nobody can prove it was me", he (if the evidence can be found) is guilty 96% of the time.

Ranger · « **Reply #11 on:** August 20, 2008, 10:42:45 AM »

Hah, every kid is able come to know this... but nice try :-) But the problem is, you can not know on which thing Im thinking about right now, soooo, you can't be 96% convinced if Im guilty or not :-) The judge would be on my side

If you can't prove - That is a law

hoffig · « **Reply #12 on:** August 20, 2008, 11:43:27 AM »

lol funny , but I dont think that Ranger has a 2 accounts but I am not sure

Justinph5 · « **Reply #13 on:** August 20, 2008, 04:05:19 PM »

this isn't court, send blood samples.

flip · « **Reply #14 on:** August 20, 2008, 05:32:56 PM »

Quote from: Ranger on August 20, 2008, 10:42:45 AM

Hah, every kid is able come to know this... but nice try :-) But the problem is, you can not know on which thing Im thinking about right now, soooo, you can't be 96% convinced if Im guilty or not :-) The judge would be on my side If you can't prove - That is a law

I can't know which thing you're thinking about right now? I would assume it is the topic. See the thing that gets most people caught isn't the trail at the moment after the crime that leads us to them. It is the possibility that they might have had a reason or ability to do the crime coupled with the way they act. You see, now after two comments you haven't denied you have more than one account and you sound more like a challenge. When people act like this it makes people want to go out of their way to look for a reason to find you guilty. The real kicker is that this isn't a courtroom. More like a dictatorship. All it takes is for one person to be convinced of your guilt. We can also just say I gave my opinion.

Ranger · « **Reply #15 on:** August 22, 2008, 12:52:51 PM »

Hmm, Why should I say that Im innocent?? Who would belive me?? Tell me

It is useless to argue It wasnt me... You have to understand that.

jitspoe · « **Reply #16 on:** October 23, 2008, 04:37:12 PM »

We'll look into it.

eXitus · « **Reply #17 on:** January 03, 2009, 05:10:26 AM »

Zett is Ranger too, Ic3y checked the IPs. Maybe he can post the serverlocs

jitspoe · « **Reply #18 on:** January 15, 2009, 10:17:28 AM »

Investigating Zett as well. (Thread for committee: http://dplogin.com/forums/index.php?topic=15209)

zimtstern · « **Reply #19 on:** March 16, 2009, 03:33:22 AM »

It s too obvious now. He s using the name "zett" of his multi account with his old account now.

http://www.dplogin.com/index.php?action=displaymembers&search=zett

Old Account:
http://www.dplogin.com/index.php?action=viewmember&playerid=5406

New Account:
http://www.dplogin.com/index.php?action=viewmember&playerid=83684