Poll

Do you(the community) think Warwulf should be banned?

Yes.
37 (61.7%)
No.
23 (38.3%)

Total Members Voted: 59

Author Topic: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished  (Read 25118 times)

coLa

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1178
Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« on: February 11, 2008, 10:51:35 PM »
[22:46] <D|2> heres the file he sent
[22:47] <D|2> [23:05] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> bah
[22:47] <D|2> [23:05] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> its jitspoe changed the format of the pcx files
[22:47] <D|2> [23:06] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> lol
[22:47] <D|2> [23:09] <DaRkNeSS|> weird
[22:47] <D|2> [23:09] <DaRkNeSS|> i looked at grensmoke
[22:47] <D|2> [23:09] <DaRkNeSS|> thats theh hud file
[22:47] <D|2> [23:10] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> yeah
[22:47] <D|2> [23:10] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> i found the other one
[22:47] <D|2> [23:10] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> its in the model files
[22:47] <D|2> [23:10] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> the one you said
[22:47] <D|2> [23:10] <DaRkNeSS|> skin
[22:47] <D|2> [23:10] <DaRkNeSS|> air
[22:47] <D|2> [23:10] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> and pcx is a photoshop file
[22:47] <D|2> [23:10] <DaRkNeSS|> or land
[22:47] <D|2> [23:10] <DaRkNeSS|> i looked at all 3
[22:47] <D|2> [23:10] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> in the gren folder
[22:47] <D|2> [23:10] <DaRkNeSS|> didnt think any would be the smoke while it is in the air
[22:47] <D|2> [23:10] <DaRkNeSS|> i also looked
[22:47] <D|2> [23:10] <DaRkNeSS|> could it be a texture
[22:47] <D|2> [23:10] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> paintball2\pball\models\items\grenades\smoke
[22:47] <D|2> [23:11] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> omg
[22:47] <D|2> [23:11] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> im a fukin idiot lmao
[22:47] <D|2> [23:11] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> its pball\sprites
[22:47] <D|2> [23:11] <DaRkNeSS|> lol
[22:47] <D|2> [23:11] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> lmao
[22:47] <D|2> [23:11] <DaRkNeSS|> smoke.sp2
[22:47] <D|2> [23:11] <DaRkNeSS|> lol
[22:47] <D|2> [23:11] <DaRkNeSS|> what progs can edit that
[22:47] <D|2> [23:12] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> dont know what smoke.sp2 is
[22:47] <D|2> [23:12] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> but smoke1_0 or what ever is the texture
[22:47] <D|2> [23:12] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> smoke1_0.tga
[22:47] <D|2> [23:12] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> that file is positivly the texture
[22:47] <D|2> [23:12] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> i just opend it in photoshop
[22:47] <D|2> [23:12] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> lol
[22:47] <D|2> [23:13] <DaRkNeSS|> well
[22:47] <D|2> [23:13] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> their i fixed it ;P
[22:48] <D|2> [23:14] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> lol
[22:48] <D|2> [23:14] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> just to let you know
[22:48] <D|2> [23:14] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> .tga file format
[22:48] <D|2> [23:14] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> has the highest priority
[22:48] <D|2> [23:14] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> :P
[22:48] <D|2> [23:14] <DaRkNeSS|> so can i delete the tga?
[22:48] <D|2> [23:14] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> try renaming the file
[22:48] <D|2> [23:14] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> dont delete
[22:48] <D|2> [23:14] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> you always want a backup
[22:48] <D|2> [23:14] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> =]
[22:50] <D|2> heres another time
[22:50] <D|2> [12:21] <[Fang]WrWf\store> just penix
[22:50] <D|2> [12:21] <[Fang]WrWf\store> lol
[22:50] <D|2> [12:21] <[Fang]WrWf\store> want it/
[22:50] <D|2> [12:22] <DaRkNeSS|> Which one is it?
[22:50] <D|2> [12:22] <[Fang]WrWf\store> its just a wall hax
[22:50] <D|2> [12:22] <[Fang]WrWf\store> make the whole map and every person transparent
[22:50] <D|2> [12:22] <[Fang]WrWf\store> lol
[22:50] <D|2> [12:23] <[Fang]WrWf\store> i dont like wall hax to much
[22:50] <D|2> [12:23] <[Fang]WrWf\store> they lag way to much
[22:50] <D|2> [12:25] <DaRkNeSS|> I mean when it opens and you join a server what version does it say joined
[22:50] <D|2> [12:25] <[Fang]WrWf\store> ohh
[22:50] <D|2> [12:25] <[Fang]WrWf\store> penix is a seperate file
[22:50] <D|2> [12:25] <[Fang]WrWf\store> what ever version of dp ur using
[22:50] <D|2> [12:25] <[Fang]WrWf\store> it will return
[22:50] <D|2> [12:25] <[Fang]WrWf\store> lol
[22:50] <D|2> [12:26] <DaRkNeSS|> hmm
[22:50] <D|2> [12:26] <[Fang]WrWf\store> like u have a my quake2.exe
[22:50] <D|2> [12:26] <[Fang]WrWf\store> and openhell.dll
[22:50] <D|2> [12:26] <[Fang]WrWf\store> u rename paintball2.exe
[22:50] <D|2> [12:26] <[Fang]WrWf\store> to
[22:51] <D|2> [12:26] <[Fang]WrWf\store> penix.exe
[22:51] <D|2> [12:26] <[Fang]WrWf\store> thene u double click the My quake2.exe
[22:51] <D|2> [12:26] <[Fang]WrWf\store> and it opens the openhell.dll
[22:51] <D|2> [12:26] <[Fang]WrWf\store> that runs dp
[22:51] <D|2> [12:26] <DaRkNeSS|> and I type gl_clear 1
[22:51] <D|2> [12:26] <DaRkNeSS|> vid_restart
[22:51] <D|2> [12:26] <[Fang]WrWf\store> its just a memory hack
[22:51] <D|2> [12:26] <[Fang]WrWf\store> yeah
[22:51] <D|2> [12:27] <DaRkNeSS|> whatever send me what you got
[22:51] <D|2> [12:27] <[Fang]WrWf\store> lol
[22:51] <D|2> [12:28] <[Fang]WrWf\store> oops
[22:51] <D|2> [12:28] <[Fang]WrWf\store> wrong button
[22:51] <D|2> [12:28] <[Fang]WrWf\store> lol
[22:51] <D|2> [12:28] <DaRkNeSS|> k send it
[22:51] <D|2> want the file he sent?
[22:51] <D|2> its just a zip with penix and a readme but im sure you have it
[22:52] <jitspoe> I already have a copy.
[22:52] <D|2> [12:36] <DaRkNeSS|> dude I put the penix in my paintball folder
[22:52] <D|2> [12:36] <DaRkNeSS|> said unable to load the quake2.ex
[22:52] <D|2> [12:36] <DaRkNeSS|> does this one work on alpha?
[22:52] <D|2> [12:37] <[Fang]WrWf\store> lol
[22:52] <D|2> [12:37] <[Fang]WrWf\store> dood
[22:52] <D|2> [12:37] <[Fang]WrWf\store> do this
[22:52] <D|2> [12:37] <DaRkNeSS|> alt f4?
[22:52] <D|2> [12:37] <[Fang]WrWf\store> put My Quake2.exe and OpenHell.dll
[22:52] <D|2> [12:38] <[Fang]WrWf\store> in c:\paintball2
[22:52] <D|2> [12:38] <[Fang]WrWf\store> or c:\games\paintball2
[22:52] <D|2> [12:38] <[Fang]WrWf\store> which ever version ur using
[22:52] <D|2> [12:38] <DaRkNeSS|> okay
[22:52] <D|2> [12:38] <[Fang]WrWf\store> RENAME UR "Paintball2.exe"
[22:52] <D|2> [12:38] <[Fang]WrWf\store> to
[22:52] <D|2> [12:38] <[Fang]WrWf\store> Penix.exe
[22:52] <D|2> [12:38] <[Fang]WrWf\store> then double click My Quake2.exe
[22:52] <D|2> [12:38] <[Fang]WrWf\store> ;p
[22:54] <D|2> [12:58] <[Fang]WrWf\Afk> jitspoes lazy
[22:54] <D|2> [12:58] <DaRkNeSS> why
[22:54] <D|2> [12:58] <[Fang]WrWf\Afk> and didnt code the excrement correctly
[22:55] <D|2> [17:30] <DaRkNeSS|aB> lol
[22:55] <D|2> [17:30] <[Fang]WrWf\afk> alpha channeling
[22:55] <D|2> [17:30] <[Fang]WrWf\afk> ohh
[22:55] <D|2> [17:30] <[Fang]WrWf\afk> i think u can
[22:55] <D|2> [17:31] <[Fang]WrWf\afk> with shader scripts
[22:55] <D|2> [17:31] <[Fang]WrWf\afk> lol
[22:55] <D|2> [17:31] <[Fang]WrWf\afk> u can wall hax
[22:55] <D|2> [17:31] <[Fang]WrWf\afk> but u have to make one for every texture
[22:56] <D|2> [20:07] <[Fang]WrWf\afk> heh
[22:56] <D|2> [20:07] <[Fang]WrWf\afk> thats how the cheat i used was 8 years ago
[22:56] <D|2> [20:07] <DaRkNeSS|aB> sooooooooo
[22:56] <D|2> [20:07] <[Fang]WrWf\afk> it bypassed the maps authentication
[22:56] <D|2> [20:07] <DaRkNeSS|aB> did it work?
[22:56] <D|2> [20:07] <[Fang]WrWf\afk> lol
[22:56] <D|2> [20:07] <[Fang]WrWf\afk> and i had to hack every single map my self
[22:56] <D|2> [20:07] <[Fang]WrWf\afk> lol
[22:56] <D|2> [20:08] <[Fang]WrWf\afk> i use to be able to climb walls and excrement
[22:56] <D|2> [20:08] <[Fang]WrWf\afk> ;)
[22:56] <D|2> [20:08] <[Fang]WrWf\afk> if i ran the server
[22:56] <D|2> [20:08] <[Fang]WrWf\afk> lol
[22:57] <D|2> ill find the spikes stuff later
[22:57] <D|2> tired of pasting
____________________________________

Here are some logs of one of DP's esteemed committee members. Question is, why is/was one of these members who is so tough on hackers so obviously involved in cheating? Why is Knack trying to avoid any type of punishment at all for this offense? Why has Spook not been punished for telling 9 people how to use/make the wallhacks that DaRkNeSS started? If the committee seems to be taking such a tough stance on cheaters, this stance must be taken on ALL cheaters, regardless of whether or not they are a committee member.

KiLo

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2086
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2008, 10:54:27 PM »
1024 Days for the lot!!!

Edit: You do know that this is going to get deleted right?

Hades

  • PGP
  • Posts: 25
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2008, 10:54:36 PM »
Pathetic.

Olbaid

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 731
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2008, 10:55:35 PM »
lmao, bet I'll get the blame for this one too.

WarWulf

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 539
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #4 on: February 11, 2008, 10:59:18 PM »
lmao, bet I'll get the blame for this one too.

naw these were said in a pub channel by darkness

these logs are 3 and 2 years ago and allready has a committee thread in progress. =]

im interested in the outcome of this poll though

postmortem

  • Stingray
  • Posts: 66
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #5 on: February 11, 2008, 11:01:23 PM »
I don't understand how anyone other than WarWulf could vote no on this... Cheaters should be punished. The end.

WarWulf

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 539
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #6 on: February 11, 2008, 11:02:59 PM »
I don't understand how anyone other than WarWulf could vote no on this... Cheaters should be punished. The end.

im actually not going to vote
« Last Edit: February 12, 2008, 01:55:48 AM by WarWulf »

coLa

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1178
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2008, 11:05:14 PM »
english please?

War

  • Stingray
  • Posts: 59
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #8 on: February 11, 2008, 11:07:14 PM »
I believe that ban should be 1024 days.

Bix

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 720
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #9 on: February 11, 2008, 11:08:37 PM »
Doesn't matter how old anything is, you cheat, you should do the time.

"I murdered this guy 15 years ago, its all good though, it happened in the past"

Hades

  • PGP
  • Posts: 25
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #10 on: February 11, 2008, 11:13:51 PM »
Doesn't matter how old anything is, you cheat, you should do the time.

"I murdered this guy 15 years ago, its all good though, it happened in the past"
lol tad extreme but point taken

WarWulf

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 539
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #11 on: February 11, 2008, 11:17:06 PM »
well first i didnt give darkness a wall hack, second off i only told him how to change a tga file. that i had totaly long forgoten about.

that is petty offence why are you compairing it to murder? LoL

it is more like. i sold him a gun.... i didnt know he would kill anyone with it.

and most important part is ive allready admited to using penix in the past many many times. you have many many a chance to ban me for it . why now?? :P


coLa

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1178
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #12 on: February 11, 2008, 11:17:12 PM »
there is nothing too extreme for these forums. you'd better learn that.

Eiii

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 4595
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #13 on: February 11, 2008, 11:18:32 PM »
there is nothing too extreme for these forums. you'd better learn that.
You != These forums

EDIT: This is directed at wulfie, not cola.
And it's pretty obvious that if you give someone specific instructions that they'll use them.

coLa

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1178
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #14 on: February 11, 2008, 11:20:48 PM »
ok....

Smokey

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1172
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #15 on: February 11, 2008, 11:29:09 PM »
Doesn't matter how old anything is, you cheat, you should do the time.

"I murdered this guy 15 years ago, its all good though, it happened in the past"
Do you not remember jitspoe giving everyone a "clean slate"? He said if you did it before, don't think of doing it again.

WarWulf

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 539
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #16 on: February 11, 2008, 11:33:42 PM »
aww smokey you ruined it =/ i wanted to see what everyone really thought. i might leave if everyone wants me gone :P

y00tz

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2742
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #17 on: February 11, 2008, 11:37:40 PM »
Surely this undated log isn't enough to ban WarWulf... When the evidence becomes unconvincing, we have a witch hunt.

WarWulf

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 539
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #18 on: February 11, 2008, 11:40:18 PM »
BURN THE WITCH!


*poof*
[13:25] <@D|2> [23:12] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> smoke1_0.tga
[13:25] <+MikeN> foxhound yu lying intercourse
[13:25] <@D|2> [23:12] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> that file is positivly the texture
[13:25] <@D|2> [23:12] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> i just opend it in photoshop
[13:25] <@D|2> [23:12] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> lol
[13:26] <@D|2> [23:13] <DaRkNeSS|> well
[13:26] <@D|2> [23:13] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> their i fixed it ;P
[13:26] <+Foxhound>  u wish
[13:26] <@D|2> [23:14] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> .tga file format
[13:26] <@D|2> [23:14] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> has the highest priority
[13:26] <@D|2> [23:14] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding>
[13:26] <@D|2> [23:14] <[Fang]Wulf\Coding> to be honest with you
[13:26] <@[Fang]Wulfie\busy> lol
[13:26] <@D|2> [23:14] <DaRkNeSS|> k send it
[13:26] <@[Fang]Wulfie\busy> that might of been me ^^
[13:26] <@[Fang]Wulfie\busy> when are those logs from??
[13:26] <@DaRkNeSS|> july 17th 2006
[13:27] <@[Fang]Wulfie\busy> heh 2 years ago

Spiders

  • PGP
  • Posts: 17
Re: Community's Opinion On Whether Or Not Warwulf Should Be Punished
« Reply #19 on: February 11, 2008, 11:42:38 PM »
rad. :)