Author Topic: Photography...  (Read 151561 times)

UnRateD

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 593
Re: Photography...
« Reply #380 on: October 15, 2008, 11:33:19 AM »
i like the cat one. and the tree. theyre all really good.

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: Photography...
« Reply #381 on: October 15, 2008, 05:43:23 PM »
S8N: That butterfly looks familiar :)

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: Photography...
« Reply #382 on: October 15, 2008, 07:02:33 PM »
Tinkered around and "miniaturized" a couple photos.  Unfortunately gimp doesn't have the lens blur.  It doesn't look as convincing with Gaussian blur.

KnacK

  • Global Moderator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 3039
Re: Photography...
« Reply #383 on: October 15, 2008, 07:04:42 PM »
how about posting the before images?

Eiii

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 4595
Re: Photography...
« Reply #384 on: October 15, 2008, 07:57:45 PM »
Maaan, gimp is really inadequate compared to commercial photo editing software.

webhead

  • Committee Member
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1185
Re: Photography...
« Reply #385 on: October 15, 2008, 08:42:58 PM »
just because it's missing a "lens blur" feature?

Eiii

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 4595
Re: Photography...
« Reply #386 on: October 15, 2008, 09:35:02 PM »
It's missing a lot of things. I tried to switch for a while, and just didn't find what I needed.

And ew, the UI. Eeew.

webhead

  • Committee Member
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1185
Re: Photography...
« Reply #387 on: October 15, 2008, 10:14:40 PM »
yeah i'll agree the UI is eww. i haven't actually tried to learn how to use it yet, myself, although i've heard of something called Gimpshop which is supposed to be GIMP under the hood with a Photoshop-esque UI. haven't tried it yet.

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: Photography...
« Reply #388 on: October 16, 2008, 09:29:00 PM »
What's ironic is that GTK (gimp toolkit) is the UI base a bunch of (mostly linux) apps use.

Eiii

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 4595
Re: Photography...
« Reply #389 on: October 16, 2008, 10:25:28 PM »
It's a matter of design, not functionality. :3

coLa

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1178
Re: Photography...
« Reply #390 on: October 18, 2008, 02:25:02 AM »
Went to the track tonight. didn't really get much. i wasn't in the "picture taking" mood. rather watch the cars race, than worry about taking pictures. especially since our track is so poorly lit, and anything over 600iso is totally unusable, i wasn't up for disappointment.

saw 2 of my friends run in their built, turbo'd hondas. one is an 800HP beast that ran a best of 10.41 out of 2 runs. putting the power to the ground is def an issue for him. he broke into the 9s once, and has yet to get there again.  i believe he is only running 10psi at our local track, but the 800hp was upward in the teens.

another guy from reynosa, mexico has a turbo'd single cam honda running pretty consistent 11.70s on 18psi from a .50trim turbo. it's a pretty budget build, that's working very well.

here is one picture i got of his setup. i'm not very fond of it, but like i said, our track isn't lit very well. plus, his pit area was surrounded by 2 ginormous trailers that were blocking pretty much any available light.


coLa

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1178
Re: Photography...
« Reply #391 on: October 19, 2008, 07:49:26 PM »
Turbo upgrade on my friends GST.



^ owner of the car.
« Last Edit: October 28, 2008, 06:54:33 PM by coLa »

coLa

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1178
Re: Photography...
« Reply #392 on: October 28, 2008, 06:53:46 PM »
where has this thread gone!?!?!?!?


[GT]Snipen

  • Stingray
  • Posts: 69
Re: Photography...
« Reply #393 on: October 31, 2008, 08:34:27 AM »

S8NSSON

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 709
Re: Photography...
« Reply #394 on: October 31, 2008, 02:25:42 PM »
That is awesome Snipen...WOW!!!

RiMiNi

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 418
Re: Photography...
« Reply #395 on: November 01, 2008, 07:59:32 PM »
I dont really know much about camera's and such. I read the article but i still dont understand, what [in photography noob's terms] does this do? ^^

webhead

  • Committee Member
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1185
Re: Photography...
« Reply #396 on: November 01, 2008, 08:11:53 PM »
i'm guessing that we'll have way better motion photos and low-light photos, and less noise at high ISO settings (maybe?).

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: Photography...
« Reply #397 on: November 03, 2008, 11:06:44 AM »
http://www.hno.harvard.edu/gazette/1999/12.09/silicon.html

Quote
Copyright 1999

I guess nothing ever came of this in almost 10 years.

DrRickDaglessMD

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 376
Re: Photography...
« Reply #398 on: November 03, 2008, 12:18:43 PM »
According to the fountain of all knowledge (wikipedia) http://www.sionyxinc.com/ acquired the technology from Harvard in 2006, so I wouldn't necessarily say a consumer application of it was vapourware yet.

S8NSSON

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 709
Re: Photography...
« Reply #399 on: November 03, 2008, 05:59:56 PM »
I wonder what the total increase in surface area is with these spikey spikes?

And it's black only cause light doesn't escape...insanity!