Author Topic: Are one on ones really relevant?  (Read 8663 times)

UnRateD

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 593
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #20 on: June 16, 2008, 01:48:13 PM »
so there already is a mute thing. good good now i can have a peaceful game uninterrupted by a bunch of 10 year olds wnaitng 1vs1s. gdgd.

theSYNDIKATE

  • VM-68
  • Posts: 149
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #21 on: June 17, 2008, 10:02:02 AM »
Ah I forgot about the ignore, but a server-side mute where no one can see what they type at all would be neat

iced

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 354
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #22 on: June 18, 2008, 12:41:39 AM »
10 year old kid: "Hey Syn 1v1?"

Me: "No, thanks."

10 year old kid: "Why?"

Me: "Cause I've got better things to do."

10 year old kid: "haha, you scared of losing?"

Me: "¬_¬"

10 year old kid: "Noob haha!!!!!!!11one11one"

*10 year old kid disconnects*



^ basically sums it up. 'nuff sed.

Apocalypse

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1463
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #23 on: June 18, 2008, 02:31:50 PM »
Code: [Select]
bind "l" "ignore all"That code is my best friend.

bucky

  • PGP
  • Posts: 2
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #24 on: June 27, 2008, 12:36:29 PM »
in my opinion 1v1's are dumb unless you know who youre playing and you are just messing around especially when you 1v1 somebody and they pick a map youve never played before then you figure out the map halfway through the game and youre already down 25-30 to not even 5 thats not cool....

Spook

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2542
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #25 on: June 27, 2008, 01:53:15 PM »
I love 1v1's just because they make the other person feel bad when they lose.

Laged

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 374
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #26 on: June 27, 2008, 02:11:31 PM »
Evil spook  >:(

iced

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 354
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #27 on: June 28, 2008, 11:20:07 AM »
unless ur on the other end of it spook :o

Spook

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2542
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #28 on: June 28, 2008, 11:34:19 AM »
Hah.

eradicator

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 585
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #29 on: June 28, 2008, 05:52:47 PM »
Spook has the best aim I think I've ever seen, I'm sure hes rarely on "the other end of it".

coLa

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1178
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #30 on: June 28, 2008, 07:40:22 PM »
so rude to joke around like that. you could really hurt somebodies feelings.

Olbaid

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 731
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #31 on: June 28, 2008, 07:51:04 PM »
Spook has the best aim I think I've ever seen, I'm sure hes rarely on "the other end of it".

Thanks for the laugh.  Almost made me choke on my drink.

Spook

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2542
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #32 on: June 28, 2008, 08:04:41 PM »
Thanks for the laugh.  Almost made me choke on my drink.
*snaps finger* darn... "almost."

We'll get that prick next time, erad. =]

eradicator

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 585
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #33 on: June 28, 2008, 08:23:29 PM »
The anthrax should arrive any day now...

Olbaid

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 731
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #34 on: June 29, 2008, 01:56:17 PM »
Personal threat and name-calling.  Something needs to be done, or I'm not sure if I can check the forums anymore for my own safety.  Stop harshing me please.

coLa

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1178
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #35 on: June 29, 2008, 05:30:30 PM »
lmfao.

iced

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 354
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #36 on: June 29, 2008, 10:17:16 PM »
Spook has the best aim I think I've ever seen, I'm sure hes rarely on "the other end of it".

it was a joke...duh

wallpainter08

  • Stingray
  • Posts: 70
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #37 on: June 30, 2008, 07:01:36 AM »
1 vs 1 is good for fun and also it is "kinda" good for new players.  This way they can get to at least look at the map a little...before they take some paint to the face (for ex. a team game you have a better chance of getting shot).

And when I know sometimes people (even in different clans) sometimes teach people new tricks if they are losing really badly.  But 1 vs 1 is not a way to prove if your clan is better than someone elses or especially prove if your better than someone.

All it shows is you can either line really good or can cap really fast on a new players.

theSYNDIKATE

  • VM-68
  • Posts: 149
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #38 on: July 01, 2008, 12:06:24 AM »
IMO the only time to 1v1 another player is when you're facing a player with more experience than you (as long as they aren't one of them know-it-all ego driven fools who think they own the game and everyone in it.) This is a good way to get better,  cause facing random nubs by server hopping that you already know you'll mop the floor with won't help you develop skill or give you any pleasure.

Homingbullet

  • VM-68
  • Posts: 125
Re: Are one on ones really relevant?
« Reply #39 on: July 01, 2008, 08:24:08 PM »
had a newb come into a pub and ask everyone for a 1v1 saying he'll raped everybody kinda made me mad. raped em with pgp. to many darn newbs in the game who think there some kind of pros.1v1 don't really prove anything. Teamwork is what gets it done. "Recon"