Author Topic: RE: >>SmD<<'s "win"  (Read 3473 times)

P!nk

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 948
_
« Reply #20 on: April 23, 2006, 01:51:25 PM »
Post removed
« Last Edit: July 26, 2010, 02:38:45 AM by P!nk »

lekky

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2449
Re: RE: >>SmD<<'s "win"
« Reply #21 on: April 23, 2006, 02:02:05 PM »
well, for me the original argument wasn't opposed to them trying to make new rules. Instead, it was about the fact that they did not explicitly tell their opponents about the different rules that they were playing by, instead choosing to explicitly tell them once the match had already started.

A discussion about "Best" rules like the one jits started seems to be the best way to go about bringing changes to the rule structure.

Slayer12159

  • PGP
  • Posts: 29
Re: RE: >>SmD<<'s "win"
« Reply #22 on: April 26, 2006, 08:23:35 PM »
can i join smd?








      i am crusher

lekky

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2449
Re: RE: >>SmD<<'s "win"
« Reply #23 on: April 27, 2006, 04:59:44 AM »
*refrains himself