Author Topic: RWS (Rock Web Server)  (Read 22531 times)

Termin8oR

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1023
Re: RWS (Rock Web Server)
« Reply #100 on: May 28, 2006, 12:05:21 AM »
Admin Abusers. All I got to say. I was jumping there and Admin changed gravity like 100 times and forceobs everyone. So yeah.

bug

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 335
Re: RWS (Rock Web Server)
« Reply #101 on: May 28, 2006, 12:08:46 AM »
Admin Abusers. All I got to say. I was jumping there and Admin changed gravity like 100 times and forceobs everyone. So yeah.

Which admin was that? We previously had an admin (WORR GAME PRODUCT) which was a terrible admin abuser of which I quickly disposed of. Spiegel was also accused of abuse, but is still in arbitration. If you have any definitive details (name of admin, sshots, etc), I would be happy to see them.

Termin8oR

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1023
Re: RWS (Rock Web Server)
« Reply #102 on: May 28, 2006, 12:10:50 AM »
It was Spiegal or what ever.

bug

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 335
Re: RWS (Rock Web Server)
« Reply #103 on: May 28, 2006, 12:13:44 AM »
It was Spiegal or what ever.

Yes, Germany and Araknid (I believe) accused him of admin abuse. His op has been temporarily disabled and he is still in arbitration at the moment.

TinMan

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1347
Re: RWS (Rock Web Server)
« Reply #104 on: May 28, 2006, 12:19:07 AM »
Your site needs alot of work Rock, its plain and ugly and disastrous.
Nobody cares what you think, and get out of my topic if you're just going to flame. ::)
Good job at starting a thread about your site and then blowing off that someone recommends that you make it look nicer. I too agree that you could easily make it look better, just simplify it, it seems very cluttered and could be made into a nice looking maplist instead.

loial21

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2807
Re: RWS (Rock Web Server)
« Reply #105 on: May 28, 2006, 01:53:18 AM »
He is at least trying. Good job. Wish we had more like you.

bug

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 335
The New Rock
« Reply #106 on: May 28, 2006, 02:06:17 PM »
IE? Covered.
Ads? Covered.
Clutter? Covered.
Long load? Covered.

Check out the main page, read the news, and enjoy the New Rock ;)

TinMan

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1347
Re: RWS (Rock Web Server)
« Reply #107 on: May 28, 2006, 02:42:43 PM »
I'm still brought here in Charon  :'(
And you could make this nicer using tables maybe? Just a thought.

bug

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 335
Re: RWS (Rock Web Server)
« Reply #108 on: May 28, 2006, 02:47:08 PM »
You will always see forbidden if you try to connect directly to the site, IE, going to the actual IP instead of http://devoted.to/rock
If Charon automatically skips through the forwarding of devoted.to/rock, then basically you're screwed.

Yes, I will be making the search engine nicer (similar to the map index with page limits so it works faster), but I still haven't fixed it yet.
« Last Edit: June 13, 2006, 01:05:26 PM by bug »

bug

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 335
Re: RWS (Rock Web Server)
« Reply #109 on: May 30, 2006, 10:47:52 AM »
Notice: All {ROCK} servers will be taken down for the day to allow for system maintenence. We apologize for the inconvenience blah blah blah.

bug

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 335
Back Up
« Reply #110 on: May 30, 2006, 09:48:21 PM »
Sorry for the wait! After some much needed defragging and other miscellaneous cleaning, the servers are back up and running.

bug

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 335
Re: RWS (Rock Web Server)
« Reply #111 on: June 13, 2006, 01:07:58 PM »
Hey y'all! It's map-pack uploading time again, but this time I have a question for you:

Right now we have 3 map packs:
All, Jump, and Normal.
(All contains Jump, Normal, and other maps (such as soccer))

It takes more of a toll (about 2 extra days of upload time, to be exact) to try and upload All when the only unique content it has is the few maps in Other. Would it bother you to have 3 packs instead, Jump, Normal, and Other? It would take 3 clicks to download all maps instead of one, but it would save 600 meg of space and days of upload time to have it this way. Should I change it or not?

Fyre

  • VM-68
  • Posts: 247
Re: RWS (Rock Web Server)
« Reply #112 on: June 14, 2006, 02:56:11 PM »
I'll give my opinion if you unban me and drop the "once a hacker, always a hacker" garbage, when the whole community knows I didn't.

bug

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 335
Re: RWS (Rock Web Server)
« Reply #113 on: June 14, 2006, 09:04:42 PM »
1. Unban you? I already did. A long time ago.
2. I'll probably reban you if you keep acting like a craphead.
3. Actually, the majority of the community (if not all) believes you did. Go figure.

Smokey

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1172
Re: RWS (Rock Web Server)
« Reply #114 on: June 14, 2006, 10:46:13 PM »
his brother did, not him. no one who is worth anything in the community thinks HE did.

GreenAffairz

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 515
Re: RWS (Rock Web Server)
« Reply #115 on: June 16, 2006, 10:18:26 PM »
bug i went to ur server and played DoPJump, it was the laggiest server ive played on ever.

SkateR

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1173
Re: RWS (Rock Web Server)
« Reply #116 on: June 16, 2006, 10:34:07 PM »
agreed ^

TinMan

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1347
Re: RWS (Rock Web Server)
« Reply #117 on: June 16, 2006, 11:21:55 PM »
Your "Rock Web Server" takes a long time to load pages, and the dpball server is even worse   :-\

SkateR

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1173
Re: RWS (Rock Web Server)
« Reply #118 on: June 16, 2006, 11:25:48 PM »
The admin is even worse. With his little "GIBB TIME" bind then he viewgibs like everyone.

bug

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 335
Re: RWS (Rock Web Server)
« Reply #119 on: June 17, 2006, 03:23:10 PM »
Nope, I'm not denying my jump server is laggy, because it is, and I never said it wasn't. 'Nuff said.

TinMan,
   Thanks for the heads up, I've changed some things and tried to economize on the RWS load time.

SkAtEr,
   The gibspray is only used on a map change or when it is requested because of blockers.