Author Topic: Demo Request: Whaley  (Read 28902 times)

Rick

  • Map Committee
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2190
Demo Request: Whaley
« on: March 31, 2012, 05:28:51 PM »
Time: About an hour from this post.

Server: Dp2 Pug

Suspicious Times:
18:54
16:03
15:33
15:18
15:12
14:40
13:15
13:02
11:36
10:56
10:04
9:35
9:13
8:48
8:14
7:49
7:08
6:39
6:03
5:29
4:07

Tried to get his demo on IRC, but he stopped talking to me as soon as I asked for it.

Anyway, I don't have anything against the guy so i'm sorry Whaley.

P.S: Screenshot just showing Whaley logged in. Will upload my demo soon.

Edit:
[10:10] <Whaley> i'm only giving mine when you give me yours fox and peppahs

Foxhound's:
http://bantero.us/demo/937

Rick's:
http://bantero.us/demo/938

and Peppah's is attached.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2012, 06:17:22 PM by Rick »

Foxhound

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 952
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2012, 05:41:59 PM »
fyi this isnt a troll. we spent like 30 minutes of our lives running around like chickens with our head cut off so peppah could record him walling. He caught on though and starts to play real dumb compared to how he played the first 20 minutes.

Rick

  • Map Committee
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2190
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2012, 05:44:59 PM »
(Different Match)

Suspicious Times:
13:15 - shoots where person is
12:24 - crosshair on him
11:46- knows
10:20
7:56
3:33
3:20 --- Runs back EVERY other time, puts crosshair ON LOW GUY - decides not to run back ***
2:00 - seems weird

This is a demo I just receieved from a previous match. I don't see how this couldn't be hacking...

Peppah

  • PGP
  • Posts: 6
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2012, 05:55:17 PM »
i spent like 30min watching him and he was so obvious then he realized what we were doing so he starts to play way different

Foxhound

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 952
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2012, 06:04:44 PM »
(Different Match)

Suspicious Times:
13:15 - shoots where person is
12:24 - crosshair on him
11:46- knows
10:20
7:56
3:33
3:20 --- Runs back EVERY other time, puts crosshair ON LOW GUY - decides not to run back ***
2:00 - seems weird

This is a demo I just receieved from a previous match. I don't see how this couldn't be hacking...

LOL at 10:20

UnRateD

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 593
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2012, 06:14:10 PM »
I dont think this is sufficient grounds for punishment. F off Rick.

p.s. gime ma name unrated back ye ho

Rick

  • Map Committee
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2190
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2012, 06:17:57 PM »
I dont think this is sufficient grounds for punishment. F off Rick.

p.s. gime ma name unrated back ye ho

Actually isn't a joke thread buddy ;)

flamer

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 280
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #7 on: March 31, 2012, 07:11:59 PM »
16:03 is pretty obvious, if not THE MOST obvious sequence. Beside that, 11:36 is a good one too and 6:39.

Justinph5

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1159
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #8 on: March 31, 2012, 07:17:58 PM »
Everyone knows he's been hacking Rick. It's just the committee is too scared to vote from just demo's... Not like when we used to be committee. ;)

Rick

  • Map Committee
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2190
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #9 on: March 31, 2012, 07:48:20 PM »
Well, the more evidence, the easier it'll be to ban him. That's the way I see it.

flamer

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 280
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #10 on: March 31, 2012, 08:07:01 PM »
How many times did we say he was hacking and you all denied it.

Rick

  • Map Committee
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2190
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #11 on: March 31, 2012, 08:14:44 PM »
How many times did we say he was hacking and you all denied it.

Thanks for your first post, but your second was not needed. I'd like to try to keep this thread to opinions of the demo's, not a 'I TolD YoU SOOO!!!' thread. Okay? You've posted your opinion, that's all that was needed.

CheMiCal

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 690
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #12 on: March 31, 2012, 10:16:21 PM »
I got a couple funny demo's of him, i'll try to get around to that later. i have nothing against whaley, i think he's a cool guy but i do think he hacks in some matchs/scrims

Foxhound

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 952
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #13 on: March 31, 2012, 10:49:25 PM »
I got a couple funny demo's of him, i'll try to get around to that later. i have nothing against whaley, i think he's a cool guy but i do think he hacks in some matchs/scrims

Pugs

Clipz

  • Committee Member
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1497
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #14 on: April 01, 2012, 07:41:43 AM »
You seen em on airtime its the worst when he will follow you through the house, or follow you through the middle ramp... If airtime didnt mess up with i load frkq2 on my old laptop he would already be done.

Whaley

  • VM-68
  • Posts: 219
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #15 on: April 01, 2012, 09:07:32 AM »
Maybe if you guys have good sound like me you would understand, but obviously you don't. I can hear you're sound movement from across the other side of the map so its easy to guess where you are. Also I knew blackout was off, I knew Peppah was chasing me as you can tell in my demo at 8:12 if I knew he was chasing me and blackout was off why would I hack? makes no sense.  Anyways here is my demo: http://bantero.us/demo/939 enjoy cuties.

Foxhound

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 952
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #16 on: April 01, 2012, 10:26:14 AM »
I have turtle beaches, and yes the sound is an advantage. But hitting someone with a pgp coming through a door when you couldn't see them (unless you have walls) is no excuse. And the example I just mentioned is in the duck demos. The sound in this game is buggy anyways, with the mirrored sounds its hard to get a grip of where exactly someone is, however, the sound is more important when someone is on a different surface, you know where the surface is, you know where the person is.

16:45 (of whaleys demo) he shoots me coming through front door pgp, the tries to hit rick doing the same.

also if you're going to watch that, might as well go to 15:30, where he stops and waits at the hump because he somehow knows im there waiting. Kinda like on the shaz 22 demo where he stops at the top of bridge and doesnt go forward because he knows the guy is on the ledge.

Those two points alone are obvious. If youre not going to watch all of these demos, I just employ you to watch the times given here, and the shaz demo.

UnRateD

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 593
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #17 on: April 01, 2012, 11:46:06 AM »
He could just be really smart when playing the game, and think hard about where people are, combining that with good sound and decent gameplay, he may perhaps not be hacking. Havent seen the demos yet, but playing with Whaley, I can genuinely vouch for the sound thing. He gets pi$$ed off and stops playing so well occasionally when someones vacuuming in the background.

gonass

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 383
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #18 on: April 01, 2012, 12:44:05 PM »
All I'm going to say is a lot of people vouched for Juicy before he was banned.  On the issue of sound, its not really that helpful.  Sometimes people are all the way across the map but it sounds like they're right next to you. The positional sound in this game isn't really that good.  This game is not a multimillion dollar production like Call of Duty or Battlefield.

CheMiCal

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 690
Re: Demo Request: Whaley
« Reply #19 on: April 01, 2012, 02:29:41 PM »
i can pinpoint where people are with my headset, just ask myers LOL. 2fort5 yesterday?!?!