too many DPB2 Servers

[lukip]

i just took a look on my dp server list and saw 45 of of 52 servers are empty (ye the game is dead blahblahblah).

what about reducing the servers or taking a limit of maximum servers per host/admin?

[xrichardx]

I dont see a problem with having many empty servers.

[mRokita]

I dont see any problem.
My server is full all the time

[MaTzeMR]

and what we euros see is only one side. At night everything looks different.

[Clipz]

Lukip you continue to amaze me with your genius ideas. You and dooci could make a powerful force of intelligence one day!

If people want to host servers it's their choice. If they want to spend money I don't think Jitspoe will oppose it. With the ideas you have you should run for office one day.

[lukip]

I dont see a problem with having many empty servers.

okey maybe its just my opinion.

and what we euros see is only one side. At night everything looks different.

nah, i dont think there is a difference.

I dont see any problem.
My server is full all the time

your speed server is full the whole day? congratulations man, you are my hero...
im sure there are a lot skilled players on it!

Lukip you continue to amaze me with your genius ideas. You and dooci could make a powerful force of intelligence one day!

better learn your own language before talking about the intelligence of other people, Mr.thanthenyouryoure.

[Clipz]

I was only complementing you no need to get upset.

[Ace]

okey maybe its just my opinion.

nah, i dont think there is a difference.

your speed server is full the whole day? congratulations man, you are my hero...
im sure there are a lot skilled players on it!

better learn your own language before talking about the intelligence of other people, Mr.thanthenyouryoure.

"Your opinions are different than mine so I'm angry and you're wrong."

Nothing will change, if people want to host a server, have at it.

[lukip]

"Your opinions are different than mine so I'm angry and you're wrong."

bullexcrement. what do you think why am i asking here on forum? because i want to force my mind?
im glad to hear other opinions, and im not angry at all.

[Clipz]

bullexcrement. what do you think why am i asking here on forum?

So mad you can't even make sense. Please stay in school! I might have to reneg my previous statements about your intelligence.

Dooci 4 president!! Ilu Shawn.

[FusSioN]

Euros players are owning this game more than Americans....

[Rick]

eh, kind of agree.

High amount of servers = less people playing together
Low amount of servers = less variety

You can't really win..

@Clipz, I think this is meant to be more of a discussion thread, rather than a 'omg, time to tr0ll da noobs' thread. He suggested something, no need to drill his anus, be peaceful for once.

[lukip]

High amount of servers = less people playing together
Low amount of servers = less variety

You can't really win..

ye, true.
i thought it would be newbie friendlier.

@Clipz, I think this is meant to be more of a discussion thread, rather than a 'omg, time to tr0ll da noobs' thread. He suggested something, no need to drill his anus, be peaceful for once.

thanks.

[Clipz]

Ok I agree, I was just agreeing sarasticly. There are way to many servers. But like I said people pay for them and Jitspoe probably won't cut them off when they are spending money for his game.

In te past you Myers and myself had discussed an official server list. This is something that should be implemented.

[MyeRs]

Less servers wont be implemented, but it would benefit the game.

People, especially europeans, are mindless beings who click on whatever server is available. New players will click on a map they know rather than a server with people. There's often times where theres 10 public servers of 2-5 people on them. With reduced servers, (and ideally improved maplists), people would be forced to play on a select few amount of servers, causing more full servers. I don't think many people have fun in empty servers. So, this eliminates that issue. Force people to play together, and bam you get more enjoyment in the game.

No reason to have more servers then players.

No reason to allow home-run servers to show up on server list. You're just allowing low-quality servers to ruin the game for new players. There's enough quality servers that home-run's should not show up on server list.

[Cameron]

No reason to allow home-run servers to show up on server list. You're just allowing low-quality servers to ruin the game for new players. There's enough quality servers that home-run's should not show up on server list.

What would be your line between the two though?  Some people do have some amazing connections, as seen by the SpeedTest thread.