Author Topic: FEATURE REQUESTS  (Read 39872 times)

halokiller27

  • PGP
  • Posts: 12
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #260 on: February 05, 2006, 10:37:33 PM »
The game is good ;) the only thing that should be added will be

*D3D support
*Software mode supprt
* And before plying a screen like in team fortress or counterstrike whre you see the rule and then sellect the tema


*This maybe  not very pausible : moving to the Q3 engine

Eiii

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 4595
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #261 on: February 05, 2006, 11:23:02 PM »
The Q3 thing was already done, as a separate game. It died.

halokiller27

  • PGP
  • Posts: 12
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #262 on: February 06, 2006, 11:15:45 AM »
Here is a anothere "not very pausible request"

Third oerson view whem playin  :o

bitmate

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1248
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #263 on: February 06, 2006, 01:38:39 PM »
Most "Ego-shooters" are in 1st person view, so no 3rd person view here ;) .

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #264 on: February 06, 2006, 02:00:44 PM »
D3D and software modes will not be done simply because they are far too much work to make the game playable for a very small minority of people who won't update their computers.  I'll probably be doing some kind of selection/info screen eventually.  3rd person would be a novelty feature that I doubt anybody would actually make use of much, so if I do implement it, it'll be a long time down the road when there's nothing else to do.

As for the quake3 engine, this game is too far into development to switch engines now, and considering how very slight changes upset some people because it didn't "feel" the same, moving over to an entirely different engine I'm sure would displease many people.  The visual quality is already about the same, if not better than Q3, so there's not really any point.  If there are any specific features that Quake3 has that paintball2 does not, I can port them over.

FreudDu31

  • Stingray
  • Posts: 89
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #265 on: February 07, 2006, 03:14:33 PM »
Can we have a var id like the function id

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #266 on: February 07, 2006, 03:21:02 PM »
Yes.  I've been meaning to add some client-side settings like that.  They'll get in there at some point.

Playah

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 485
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #267 on: February 12, 2006, 06:04:44 AM »
I´ve just read your post in the "jitspoe´s plan" topic and im excited that youre nearly finished with build 16. How many weeks are left in your calculations till the release of the new build?