Author Topic: FEATURE REQUESTS  (Read 39894 times)

Excalibur

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 492
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #40 on: September 15, 2003, 08:02:34 PM »
i got a requests how about a boot so you can vote boot guys that are being female doges. and what about a vote to change the map so you dont have to change team and you can pick the map you want.

Anrkist

  • VM-68
  • Posts: 103
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #41 on: September 15, 2003, 10:24:31 PM »
I could be wrong.. but I think you can talk to er33t.. or any one of the server admins about vote kicks?? I think some of the admin mods allow that.. not sure of the compadibility.. some of them might be to stable for er33t to want to run, dunno ;] But I definatly agree with you.. that would be a nice feature to have...

Right on Jit.. that would kick alot of ass =]

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #42 on: September 16, 2003, 07:32:56 PM »
Yeah, voting (for maps at least) is on the todo list.  Well, there's the oldstyle voting that's still on there but for some reason resulted in server instability.  I have a new method which I've discussed before which will basically increase a maps position in the rotation when it is voted for.  Also it would be nice to have voting for different game modes.

I'm a bit wary on voting for player kicks because it might be abused.  I can still put it in, though.

Anrkist

  • VM-68
  • Posts: 103
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #43 on: September 17, 2003, 08:47:34 AM »
I know what your saying.. but ive seen them in action.. if the majority of the people on a server want to kick someone.. I see it as "The people have spoken"

Even if the person didnt do anything wrong.. if 7 out of 12 people want someone off.. they no doubt have a good reason for it.

Excalibur

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 492
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #44 on: September 17, 2003, 12:19:29 PM »
yea but that could be cause he is better then others and peeps think he is botting. i got another q is there a bot pretection like punkbuster of q3?

Anrkist

  • VM-68
  • Posts: 103
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #45 on: September 17, 2003, 01:09:54 PM »
Bot protection.. cheat protection.. its all one big joke IMO.. People cheat on er33t all the time.. even with thier "protection". So do people in q3 and HL.. theres really not much you can do about it. Sad said he was working on encryption methods.. but we have yet to see it =]

And yes.. it is possible that someone would get booted for cheating.. but I find its usualy one person complaining about cheaters.. not an entire server.

Excalibur

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 492
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #46 on: September 17, 2003, 02:30:43 PM »
well some kind of punkbuster things stops some bots you will never stop all bots thats like stoping all terrirest it just cant be done but it would stop some and thats good is it not. and thats why we have a booter so if we think someone is cheating we can boot him

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #47 on: September 17, 2003, 08:54:00 PM »
"if we think someone is cheating"

Yeah.  Back when I was playing around with CS, I got kicked off of 3 servers in a row for supposedly cheating when I wasn't.

Anrkist

  • VM-68
  • Posts: 103
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #48 on: September 17, 2003, 09:31:13 PM »
Yeah well if this community was anything like the CS one.. I wouldent still be around =]

Excalibur

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 492
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #49 on: September 17, 2003, 09:39:28 PM »
i know alot of peeps that make and sell vedio cards with walls hacks in them just for cs so i know alot of peeps that do cheat in that game thats why i stoped plaing it.
also i dont know if this is in the works or not (to lazy to read the whole forum to find out), but what about a program that is like gamespy arcade or the all seeing eye thingy to find servers, but only for pb2. i used to play gloom and it had something they made, that lised all gloom servers on it maybe you guys should make one of those.
« Last Edit: September 17, 2003, 10:37:24 PM by Excalibur »

Anrkist

  • VM-68
  • Posts: 103
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #50 on: September 18, 2003, 05:11:25 AM »
lol..=] you mean the in-game server browser?? There is one built in.

IronFist

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1304
_
« Reply #51 on: September 18, 2003, 07:56:00 AM »
Post removed
« Last Edit: July 25, 2010, 10:10:14 PM by IronFist »

Anrkist

  • VM-68
  • Posts: 103
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #52 on: September 21, 2003, 02:18:56 PM »
What if you made the chat text seperate from the join/quit text?? Maybe a seperate box.. "Anrkist quit" doesnt need to be a huge box for those.. wouldent take up much space.


I mentioned this awhile ago.. get rid of grabs.. turn it in to holds.. you shouldent get a point for just grabbing the flag and then dieing.. you should get one for holding it after a round is over though.
« Last Edit: September 25, 2003, 08:31:13 AM by Anrkist »

Eiii

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 4595
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #53 on: September 26, 2003, 10:55:14 AM »
there aren't points for grabs, only holds. what server?

Anrkist

  • VM-68
  • Posts: 103
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #54 on: September 26, 2003, 03:44:41 PM »
See the G when you hit f1?? that stands for grabs.. im pretty sure you get a point for just grabbing still.

Could be wrong though...

Edit: I used bots to try it out.. yup.. I droped the flag the point stayed.. I died with flag.. point stayed. =]

Also a bug.. when a flag is grabbed and the round ends and its still being held.. you see it in both the carriers hand and back at the flag point.
« Last Edit: September 26, 2003, 04:02:13 PM by Anrkist »

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #55 on: September 26, 2003, 06:26:45 PM »
Well, grabs are noted, but it doesn't give your team any points.

As for separating the chat/other msgs... It may not be very easy to do the way the code is set up.

Lunatic_

  • PGP
  • Posts: 3
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #56 on: October 01, 2003, 05:23:32 PM »
I think, you should add a green team to dp, and a green splat for the funnames. I dont know if you can do that though.

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #57 on: October 06, 2003, 06:14:11 PM »
Green would have too much of an advantage, I think (on grassy maps, anyway).  Next build will let you use colored text, so you can just color splats green, though.

Excalibur

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 492
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #58 on: October 06, 2003, 09:39:53 PM »
i rememer they had a few maps that was set up for 4 players blue red yellow and purp and if only red blue and yellow was there it would block off the purps base so you could not get that flag what ever happend to that map?

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #59 on: October 07, 2003, 10:09:54 PM »
You're probably referring to Kaos.  It would be neat to see more 4-team maps, but unfortunately there aren't usually enough people on the server to make it feasible.