Author Topic: Insane [i] Off-Topic Posts (Read 8963 times)

Spook · « **Reply #40 on:** October 24, 2006, 06:57:38 PM »

Tinny, you know I'm not.

jitspoe · « **Reply #41 on:** October 24, 2006, 07:01:35 PM »

I would penetrate your mom, but as far as I know, she doesn't play F.E.A.R.

doughz · « **Reply #42 on:** October 24, 2006, 10:07:31 PM »

F.E.A.R. is way overrated.

Eiii · « **Reply #43 on:** October 25, 2006, 12:11:11 AM »

You, sir, are incorrect.

loial21 · « **Reply #44 on:** October 25, 2006, 01:57:09 AM »

He meant E.I.I.I.

She does play 'F.E.A.R. T.H.I.S.'

What the....
Ironfist that is my goto word.

You are not allowed to use it with out expressed written consent from the law offices of "B.B. & E. L.L.C". (Big Bird, Burt and Ernie Limited Liability Company). Any attempt to copy, re-distribute or re-manufacture is strictly prohibited by the Street of Sez-me and punishable up to and including a date with s8n.

ViciouZ · « **Reply #45 on:** October 25, 2006, 02:51:41 AM »

Quote from: loial21 on October 25, 2006, 01:57:09 AM

... punishable up to and including a date with s8n.

My God, I thought there was nothing worse than being stuck in a room with Bill Gates and hundreds of dancing directx symbols. Oh... the HORROR!

*sobs and puts next tab on tongue*

doughz · « **Reply #46 on:** October 25, 2006, 07:39:41 AM »

Quote from: eiii on October 25, 2006, 12:11:11 AM

You, sir, are incorrect.

Nah...Cs 1.6 is far better than F.E.A.R. Combat. Graphics don't take precedence over classic gameplay.

Eiii · « **Reply #47 on:** October 25, 2006, 08:56:28 AM »

Fear's gameplay is slow-paced, but tons of fun. It may not be 'classic', but you have to think. The graphics are a plus too, though.

IronFist · « **Reply #48 on:** October 25, 2006, 09:23:42 AM »

Post removed

jitspoe · « **Reply #49 on:** October 25, 2006, 11:41:08 AM »

Quote from: eiii on October 25, 2006, 08:56:28 AM

Fear's gameplay is slow-paced

No way, fear has some of the fastest paced gameplay I've seen. Sure you can't run around quickly, but you can walk into a room and kill like 3 guys in about half a second, and it's not unusual for TDM scores to jump around by like 60+ points. CS sucks because if you fire more than 1 or 2 shots in a row or move while shooting, you start hitting the floor and ceiling.

SkateR · « **Reply #50 on:** October 25, 2006, 12:53:28 PM »

cs is absolutely terrible. Warsow and et > cs

IronFist · « **Reply #51 on:** October 25, 2006, 01:56:30 PM »

Post removed

TinMan · « **Reply #52 on:** October 25, 2006, 02:36:06 PM »

If anything I'd say CS is slow gameplay in the regular gametypes, if you're not playing on a surf map then its a waste of a quake-based engine.
F.E.A.R. has slow-motion, no duh its gonna be slow.

SkateR is right, Warsow and ET > CS.
In my opinion, CS isn't that horrible of a game when playing with friends, but when you play online...the community makes the game suck...reminds me of Halo.

Spook · « **Reply #53 on:** October 25, 2006, 05:13:55 PM »

instant revivals for the most part too, and cs you have to wait for that one last camper to run down time, or get raped hardcore.

doughz · « **Reply #54 on:** October 25, 2006, 05:18:24 PM »

lmao. Shane hates CS because he is absolutely terrible, and the difficulty of aiming makes it more realistic, which is what it was trying to accomplish. F.E.A.R. is extremely fast paced in a TDM/DM server, and the graphics are awesome no doubt, but for some reason I absolutely love CS.

SkateR · « **Reply #55 on:** October 25, 2006, 05:38:47 PM »

ET > Cs.

jitspoe · « **Reply #56 on:** October 25, 2006, 05:55:38 PM »

One thing I hate about CS is the range of damage bullets will do. Sometimes you hit somebody and it'll do like 130 damage, and sometimes it'll do like 2. I also hate how weak the grenades are. Most of all, though, I dislike the "buying" concept.

TinMan · « **Reply #57 on:** October 25, 2006, 06:19:55 PM »

Yeah...buying is a pain, you gotta make binds and then memorize what does what, just like in Tremulous.

Spook · « **Reply #58 on:** October 25, 2006, 06:30:34 PM »

CS 1.6 doesnt let you customize packages, therefore CS:CZ > CS 1.6 (personally i hate source.)

TinMan · « **Reply #59 on:** October 25, 2006, 06:47:55 PM »

Poor Spook...can you even run Source? I agree with you on hating CS:S, its a shame that I haven't seen a single good game on that engine...SiN came close...until I stopped looking at screenshots and actually played it. LOL
Fortress Forever is looking good though. http://www.fortress-forever.com/
And as long as you can still pee on people, Postal 3 will be decent. Its too bad Valve hasn't put more effort into making games that might actually be good on their powerful engine.

Now that I've ripped on Valve, I think that I must bring up an id Software issue too that was a big deal to me: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2002/05/24
Doom III was the biggest game letdown that I'd ever experienced. It just goes to show that a great engine doesn't necessarily mean a great game.