Author Topic: Official Feature Vote of 2007  (Read 233137 times)

coLa

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1178
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1040 on: November 04, 2007, 09:37:18 PM »
+5001 for air control!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

flip

  • Committee Member
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1388
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1041 on: November 04, 2007, 09:40:02 PM »

Termin8oR

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1023
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1042 on: November 04, 2007, 11:06:56 PM »
-1 wall jump
+1 Team Deathmatch

Zorchenhimer

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2614
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1043 on: November 04, 2007, 11:08:07 PM »
-1 wall jump

Cobo

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1362
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1044 on: November 04, 2007, 11:16:27 PM »
Why do you guys keep minus voting when you know well that that's not what this thread is for...

Eiii

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 4595
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1045 on: November 04, 2007, 11:24:31 PM »
I'm pretty sure it's just to show that there's a fair/huge amount of opposition to the idea.

coLa

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1178
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1046 on: November 05, 2007, 12:30:29 PM »
+1 walljump

KnacK

  • Global Moderator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 3039
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1047 on: November 05, 2007, 01:28:58 PM »
-1 walljump

QueeNiE

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 435
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1048 on: November 05, 2007, 03:24:20 PM »
-10 Walljump :P

magalhaes

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1256
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1049 on: November 05, 2007, 03:28:29 PM »
You guys are just making it harder for jitspoe to count the votes.

cusoman

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 524
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1050 on: November 05, 2007, 03:45:01 PM »
lol, based on what was "-" voted, i guess no one likes the walljump idea, besides cola, who i think was just proving a point. might as well remove it then from the vote counting as it probably hit an all time record as most negatively vote idea in the history of DP. Oh well, i try. ;D
-Cusoman

Cobo

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1362
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1051 on: November 05, 2007, 03:56:29 PM »
I'm pretty sure it's just to show that there's a fair/huge amount of opposition to the idea.
yes, yet I doubt it will be removed from the votes.

nightryder

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 448
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1052 on: November 05, 2007, 04:47:44 PM »
thats something though, what if it 50 people vote for something but 1000 people dont want it. will it be implemented because it would be top on the list.

what if noone except the people that voted for it dont want faster downloading (just an example) but it is implemented, pissing off the rest of the community

XtremeBain

  • Developer
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1470
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1053 on: November 06, 2007, 06:21:41 AM »
thats something though, what if it 50 people vote for something but 1000 people dont want it. will it be implemented because it would be top on the list.

what if noone except the people that voted for it dont want faster downloading (just an example) but it is implemented, pissing off the rest of the community

It's a better system than what was done before, i.e. taking away -Z tricks, capping FPS, capping gl_modulate, forcing impact grenades, adding strafe jump tripping and making it default, or screwing with the flag system and still leaving it defaulted.  At least people have to vote for it and it gives people a chance to discuss it rather than implement it, cripple the game, then discuss and fix.

Garrett

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1372
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1054 on: November 06, 2007, 07:45:05 AM »
-1 walljump
+1 wall jump and congrats knack on 1000th post

y00tz

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2742
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1055 on: November 06, 2007, 07:48:31 AM »
New Request

Regarding: Game

+1 for soluble paintballs.  As far as I know, there is currently no disadvantage for being in water too long (i.e. drowning or loss of health) and that doesn't make sense for a one-hit kill, paintball game, but I think it'd be a unique idea to implement soluble paintballs, therefore if you underwater trip is prolonged , while you're under the water, some of your paintballs would dissolve (paintballs = gelatin, dissolve in water), so that there is a disadvantage to water-camping or staying underwater too long, and it adds a unique element to the game.

-y00tz

Garrett

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1372
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1056 on: November 06, 2007, 07:51:32 AM »
+1 y00tz idea.  Water campers stink

Playah

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 485
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1057 on: November 06, 2007, 08:10:33 AM »
That's not really a good idea. Ever been beaten by a water camper? I rather prefer to stay outta the water ingame.

Eiii

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 4595
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1058 on: November 06, 2007, 08:34:00 AM »
If you stay underwater for too long, you die.

magalhaes

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1256
Re: Official Feature Vote of 2007
« Reply #1059 on: November 06, 2007, 08:36:26 AM »
+1 for soluble paintballs.  As far as I know, there is currently no disadvantage for being in water too long (i.e. drowning or loss of health) and that doesn't make sense for a one-hit kill, paintball game, but I think it'd be a unique idea to implement soluble paintballs, therefore if you underwater trip is prolonged , while you're under the water, some of your paintballs would dissolve (paintballs = gelatin, dissolve in water), so that there is a disadvantage to water-camping or staying underwater too long, and it adds a unique element to the game.
huh? You can barely shoot under water and as Eiii mentioned you do drown.