Digital Paint Discussion Board

Fairness Enforcement => Issues for Committee Review => Topic started by: MyeRs on September 11, 2010, 11:08:27 AM

Title: Hackusation: shk
Post by: MyeRs on September 11, 2010, 11:08:27 AM
Well it's this time of week again, shk got accused of wallhacking again and gwb made a video with penix enabled. This time was in a league match on Indune[no tele] - a small 1 path map in a 3v3. In this particular match there was plenty of camping for both sides [demo will show my point] - so, ignoring mid for the most part, spamming nades and lining is all that really happened. Entering base on this map, your going to spray everything because its small and stuff, and seeing lines/hearing jumping is very useful on a map like this.

Now, one other things I'd like people to know prior to watching the demo. During this match and every match that is [CC] vs >o.O< - CC takes remote screenshots [the committee screenshots] atleast once if not more per map. They automatically send to jitspoe.

Also - if you look on www.banterous.co.uk you'll see shk has 4 downloads on his indune demo. [as of right now]. So people are going on about how he hacks because of a video gwb made with penix enabled. So now the demo and the vimeo video. Watch the demo prior to the penix'd version. The penix'd version you'll see people on the other side of the walls he's lining but it's indune in a 3v3, if theres in base theres 2 rooms they can be in.

Demo: http://www.banterous.co.uk/index.php?page=demo&id=353

Video: http://vimeo.com/14873900

I understand that me being his clanmate makes my opinion less relevant to most. But the times I was given made me just plain out laugh. I admit theres maybe 4 'odd' or 'suspicious' times, but about half are recon of those.

These are the times Riddick gave me [with my opinion next to it]

[11:56] <Riddick> 1st 10 seconds - bix is running in shooting, you can see the spray.
[11:56] <Riddick> 4:01 - They line in main, he lines out. I revive main and am getting shot out + recon.
[11:56] <Riddick> 5:17 - He creeps out and is spraying the bridge, then Riddick jumps into it.
[11:56] <Riddick> 7 mins - He nades they main and sprays it?
[11:57] <Riddick> all vimeo time
[11:57] <Riddick> 15:42 - What? He nades in, sprays in. did I miss something?
[11:57] <Riddick> 14:40 - He has recon... yet he still did nothing wrong? he nades their flag.
[11:59] <Riddick> 16:44 - Recon + he sprayed the main room to flag and jusu was standing there?
[11:58] <GoNAsS> 615 blatant - He crawls under and gets shot, wouldn't it be more the guy who found him that seems bad?

That is my opinion. Whats yours? I posted it here because it got annoying seeing Riddick in every channel posting the video and attempting to convince everyone he hacks. So that's my opinion, i'm aware it will differ from alot of peoples. I want people to view the actual demo, I think they'll find it really isn't bad.

Potentially more to come?!?!

[12:09] <Riddick> hes getting banned
[12:09] <Riddick> :(
[12:10] <Riddick> gwb is going to look at you and chemicals next
[12:10] <Riddick> might get a 2fer
[12:10] <Riddick> maybe even a 3fer

EDIT:
7mins - Riddick told me its when he changes his line to the guy on the box. If you watch his demo not the penix'd version, he has no clue a guy is there. He doesn't raise his line for no reason, he raises it to shoot the automag boxes.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: ViciouZ on September 11, 2010, 11:19:50 AM
Suspicious video times (vimeo playback not game clock)
4:25
13:30 - probably just recon
19:30
20:10 - doesnt move until player appears -- could easily be recon though

Doesn't really look like hacking to me, just some luck, recon and good play. There are only a few suspicious points, and lots of places that would just be dumb things to do if he had walls, even if he was trying to conceal them.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: JUICEY on September 11, 2010, 11:28:11 AM
I watched the demo + the video, and I really don't see anything that would make me say he hacks. He's one of the best players. I wont lie I see a few suspicious moments but I really don't see anything that would make me change my opinion about him not hacking.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: Myles on September 11, 2010, 11:32:12 AM
I dont see anything that shows he hacks. A couple of the times his teammates are dead so he has recon. shks demos have been requested more than anyone, Im pretty sure we would know if he hacked by now..
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: coLa on September 11, 2010, 11:39:33 AM
Why do you care so much if he doesn't hack? Taking the time to type this whole rant out. Worthless.

If he hacks, pathetic. If not, Idc.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: idias on September 11, 2010, 12:08:19 PM
Riddick told me a couple times but I'm gonna use the ones myers and ViciouZ have in their posts.
My oppinion regarding the times:

0:10 -  Bix is spraying, he just sees the shot direction and shoots him, you can tell he changes hands.
4:01 -  Both Vanity and MyeRs had just revived so they probably just told him where he was at + shots direction.
4:25 -  In the actual demo shockwave actually sees him.
5:17 -  He lines over the box, people either creep it or get on top of it, Riddick got on top of it and got shot.
7:00 - If not mid it's kind of obvious you're either base or main, so he nades it and lines it.
13:30 - Weird.
14:40 - Nothing wrong.
15:42 - When you're in base the spots you're at are limited most people get in the corner boxes, sit flag, sit behind the box by flag... Nothing weird IMO
19:30 - Suspicious but not that many places to be at.
20:10 - One of his teammates is dead = recon.

I was there at the time of the match and didn't really see anything weird (I took note of the 2 weird times in zpar but I don't know where I put it at...)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

@Cola: True, but Riddick and others clearly do to take the time to do this vimeo vid and to PM me daily telling me that shk hacks.

 <Riddick> [08:07] <CheMiCaL> thats
 <Riddick> [08:07] <MyeRs> europeans.
 <Riddick> [08:07] <MyeRs> have faith.
 <Riddick> [08:07] <CheMiCaL> the only way u can win
 <Riddick> [08:07] <MyeRs> Allstarz/Europeans
 <Riddick> [08:07] <CheMiCaL> you're upset
 <Riddick> [08:07] <CheMiCaL> about losing
 <Riddick> lmfao
 <Riddick> only way we can win is if they get banned
 <Riddick> basically just admitted he hacks

That was also in the vids description and I just think its funny... That shows nothing. They just say that thats the reason you're taking this so seriously in order to get shk banned. When you think someone hacks every little move they do looks way worse then it actually is. I admit there are some really suspicious times but overall it doesn't LOOK like he hacks.

Hint: Look at his zpar11_beta demo, some moments look like speedhacks to me, and maybe bix's but his I'm not so sure.

EDIT: Shk told me to put this here:   http://www.speedyshare.com/files/24208260/idiasspeedzpar.dm2
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: joonas on September 11, 2010, 12:35:06 PM
There is no way for Shockwave to have wallhacked all this time if this is how he plays while using it. I'm suggesting that there's a huge mental strain involved and that he'd have stopped playing pb2 by now if he had.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: Delphi on September 11, 2010, 12:39:28 PM
Quote
in this edition of shks adventures he's in a League match and cheating as well.
now if this doesn't get shk banned, there's a problem with the people jitspoe has put into place to make sure cheating doesn't run free.
Slander.

Shks demo is not suspicious. I have watched it before I watched the video on vimeo and there was no moment where i would say he hacks. Yes on vimeo it looks as he would use a wh in some moments but you will find such suspicious moments on every demo recorded on indune with penix enabled.
Please stop posting a demo request/vimeo video after every match you lost. If it was a demo on a map like pbcup_renoir and he would know every round where the enemy was without getting recon - ok - but srsly Indune?... grow up guys.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: gonass on September 11, 2010, 02:27:07 PM
its not suspicious, its blatant.  we can't take half  of you peoples word for it because you're all friends of shk.  this video to me is even more suspicious than the one of the lock out.

and myers, if he has nothing to hide why even bother with all of this?  you seem to go to great lengths trying to convince every one that he's not hacking.  the majority of this community believes he does.

also myers, some thing you've not made comment on is how he moves when a player is coming in from around the wall.  with out being able to see them through the wall its very unlikely he'd know.  recon can only go so far and it takes recon a second to go through.  


let me also bring to every one's attention that shk's been banned for hacking before.  if there's been a trend on dp its that hackers usually repeat their actions.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: SkaDooSh on September 11, 2010, 04:34:12 PM
the majority of this community believes he does.

Are you seeing posts that I'm not? This thread asks people in the community to post their opinion about the video/demo. All I can see is people saying its not suspicious to them. I agree with Delphi's post 100%

Doesn't really look like hacking to me, just some luck, recon and good play.
I watched the demo + the video, and I really don't see anything that would make me say he hacks.
I dont see anything that shows he hacks.
There is no way for Shockwave to have wallhacked all this time if this is how he plays while using it.
I admit there are some really suspicious times but overall I doesn't LOOK like he hacks.
Shks demo is not suspicious.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: gonass on September 11, 2010, 05:44:17 PM
they didn't post it skadoosh
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: gonass on September 11, 2010, 05:44:27 PM
actually they did, when they requested his demo all those times.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: gonass on September 11, 2010, 05:45:49 PM
also a few people you quoted skadoosh are friends with shk, of course they're sticking up for him. 
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: gonass on September 11, 2010, 05:47:48 PM
. All I can see is people saying its not suspicious to them. I agree with Delphi's post 100%



you obv read my post because you quoted it, i said it is suspicious yet you say all you see is people saying its not.  so skadoosh as far as im concerned you can no longer put any thing valid in to this subject.  you've already contradicted your self.
also, it appears skadoosh is part of the "shk crew".  since he has very close ties his arguments are not valid and he should not be allowed to vote on ban


also, half of them didnt explain why its not suspicious they just said that its not.  i've gone in to detail on how it is so which should be listened to? mine of course



viciouz, i will make a list of all the suspicious times but you might as well just assume my list will be every second of the match.  not even a minute in to it i can point out suspicious moments
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: idias on September 11, 2010, 06:32:40 PM
i said it is suspicious yet you say all you see is people saying its not.  so skadoosh as far as im concerned you can no longer put any thing valid in to this subject.  you've already contradicted your self.
Could you please explain that a little bit better, a big little. What Rico said, and I quote "Are you seeing posts that I'm not? This thread asks people in the community to post their opinion about the video/demo. All I can see is people saying its not suspicious to them." -- Where did he contradict himself in that? When he says all I can see he means a majority of people has a different opinion because you said "the majority of this community thinks he does"


also, half of them didnt explain why its not suspicious they just said that its not.  i've gone in to detail on how it is so which should be listened to? mine of course
I didn't and I'm not really shk's buddy so you can't say I'm biased.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: SkaDooSh on September 11, 2010, 09:22:57 PM
All I stated was that you claim "the majority of the community" finds it suspicious, yet almost everyone who has posted on this thread says otherwise. Tell "the majority" to come post their opinion here. Sure there are people sticking up for him, but there are also some "out to get him".

Go watch every other demo of Indune that was played this week, mine included, and you will see "suspicious" times. Delphi nailed it.
Yes on vimeo it looks as he would use a wh in some moments but you will find such suspicious moments on every demo recorded on indune with penix enabled.

Didn't know I was apart of the "shk crew", but cool!

Btw, there's a button called "modify" to prevent posting 4 times in a row.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: Foxhound on September 12, 2010, 01:21:59 AM
btw he can double triple quadruple post if he darn well pleases. ill stick up for my team mate and friend too.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: Rocky on September 12, 2010, 04:27:30 AM
hmm watched first 10minutes and saw absolutely nothing there..
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: gonass on September 12, 2010, 11:47:46 AM
All I stated was that you claim "the majority of the community" finds it suspicious, yet almost everyone who has posted on this thread says otherwise. Tell "the majority" to come post their opinion here. Sure there are people sticking up for him, but there are also some "out to get him".

Go watch every other demo of Indune that was played this week, mine included, and you will see "suspicious" times. Delphi nailed it.
Didn't know I was apart of the "shk crew", but cool!

Btw, there's a button called "modify" to prevent posting 4 times in a row.

and theres also a button called post where i can post another idea in a separate one, only difference is you have to scroll down some more. 

idias i already explained the contradiction once to you on irc and also its right there in his post.


skadoosh, its more about how many suspicious moments.  a couple can slide but, as i stated, shks got many suspicious moments, which make up the whole video imo. also,  skadoosh a lot of them have already posted on the forums before saying they believe he uses hacks.  i mean look at how many demo requests he gets.

as i said before, its not about just how he lines its also about how he moved when enemies start to come closer.  he moves as if he know's exactly where they're coming from and when they're coming.  recon can only be slightly descriptive while keeping it short and simple so that they get it in time. 


like i told myers on irc, when i used to hear people say they think some one is using a hack, such as wall hacks or an aim bot, i asked them how they could tell because i couldn't.  their reply was always "you'd have to use one or see a video of some one using one to be able to tell".  after watching his demo videos with out penix on and with it on i'm thoroughly convinced that he uses wall hacks.
i used to vouch for shk, because i believed he didn't.  after seeing these i changed my opinion, which shk told me many others have done the same.  many others used to not believe he hacked but have changed their opinion.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: flip on September 12, 2010, 12:43:58 PM
Gonass,

   First of all, if you want to be picky, Skadoosh simply stated the fact. Which is....  THIS THREAD WAS MADE FOR PEOPLE TO GIVE AN OPINION ON THIS PARTICULAR DEMO.

If you find it hard to understand Skadoosh's post then I can help you break it down. Simply scroll to the top of the thread and count how many people that have posted in favor of shk not hacking in this particular demo. You stated everyone in the community thinks he hacks. If you want to be specific you are the one who is confused or didn't put enough info in your initial post for others to understand YOU. This thread is about him hacking this demo. The "community" that has replied in THIS thread has said he wasn't hacking in this demo.

If you want to call my clanmates out on being part of the shk crew I would advise you to do your research prior to your accusations. There is a large love/hate relationship between our two teams. Do I believe shk hacks? On some days. I also was his primary supporter for the longest time when everyone blamed s2k for doing a witch hunt on him. Is shk good? yes. Most GOOD players can react in indune this way. Go watch team-x vs. starz. Plenty of "suspicious" times there. I would simply call it being out classed on indune.

This demo? Absolutely not. Simple as that. There is one non-shkcrew (congrats for having a crew shk, although I call it the myerscrew) that agrees with the thread creator that shk is not hacking in this demo.

*I forgot to ask...   Can I be part of the crew now?

Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: gonass on September 12, 2010, 03:49:51 PM
You stated everyone in the community thinks he hacks.

no i didn't i said there was a majority.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: DuDe on September 12, 2010, 06:53:40 PM
Well i find it somewhat odd in places to be honest!! But what do i know I've just been playing almost 8 years =/
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: gonass on September 12, 2010, 09:12:24 PM
watched Riddick's demo of the same match.  now i'm even more convinced shk was hacking.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: kazee on September 13, 2010, 08:03:21 AM
Its indune, a one path map... if you don't go around corners spraying you don't have a chance.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: flip on September 13, 2010, 09:38:20 AM
You stated everyone in the community thinks he hacks.

no i didn't i said there was a majority.
Majority, still the same thing. The majority in this thread appears not to believe he hacks. So which is it? The majority of the community? Or what you believe to be the majority? Simply stated all you needed to do was post your opinion on the question stated, not throw out "everyone else's opinions".
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: coLa on September 13, 2010, 10:37:52 AM
6 people is not the majority of the community. Half the people that play don't even use the forum.

What's with all this spray around corners and line this and that. Newbies. I don't shoot till I see someone. I don't need to prefire to roll kiddies.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: gonass on September 13, 2010, 06:46:01 PM
6 people is not the majority of the community. Half the people that play don't even use the forum.

What's with all this spray around corners and line this and that. Newbies. I don't shoot till I see someone. I don't need to prefire to roll kiddies.




this is what i said before flip.  personally, after seeing moderators on the board like knack lock a thread for flaming but he would put a last post on it flaming some one, i decided to stay away from forums till recently.

Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: Olbaid on September 13, 2010, 11:03:16 PM
I don't understand how reiterating how many people in this thread believe or do not believe he is hacking has any relevance.  First off, most people who play this game can not even form their own thought, and just go on what other people say.  I have seen this first hand in many instances, especially while I was in the committee.  So the 'majority' bullexcrement has no backing, especially from people who regularly post on this forum.

This thread was created to counter the accusations, so it should be focused on that only.  I was told about this video made of his demo by people from IRC, but never watched it until I saw this thread.  I only watched it because Myers wanted to defend his clan mate, which I thought was unusual, considering he has been accused many times before. 

Yes, we all know that you can take a demo from pretty much everyone, and there will likely be somewhat of a 'suspicious' shot.  Yes, we know all know the map was indune and people can easily spam around corners.  What most people fail to realize is how he reacts when the opposing team is or isn't near him.  It just isn't a coincidence that he knows when and when not to line around corners, or when and when not to move when someone is rushing him.  Also, a majority of the time, players have to react to someone around a corner to actually aim on them, instead of being on them right away at all times.

I'm not going to take the effort and point out times in the demo, because I know it has no relevance to what the current committee decides.  This is not a flame to the committee I just know how it works.  I feel that people are accustomed to watching/finding blatantly obvious wallhackers, instead of realizing how a 'good' wallhacker/cheater can play while hiding it. 
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: flip on September 14, 2010, 04:13:20 PM
Baid,

 We all know that wall hackers can hide the fact that they wall. I am sorry the thread got derailed.

Gonass,

   No matter how much I like knack, I am not knack. I do not lock many threads but will if needed. Maybe you should come around the forums more often.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: gonass on September 14, 2010, 06:03:23 PM
i wasn't accusing you of such things flip, i was only giving an example of how an active dp player might not post on the forums.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: Dirty_Taco on September 14, 2010, 08:29:22 PM
Quote
What most people fail to realize is how he reacts when the opposing team is or isn't near him.  It just isn't a coincidence that he knows when and when not to line around corners, or when and when not to move when someone is rushing him.  Also, a majority of the time, players have to react to someone around a corner to actually aim on them, instead of being on them right away at all times.

The only worthwhile thing in this thread.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: gonass on September 14, 2010, 11:41:09 PM
videos on new web site.

http://www.multiupload.com/9249GE0MR2

more to come!!


edit - http://www.multiupload.com/KUCPVKJQS4
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: gonass on September 21, 2010, 05:18:06 PM
so, pointing to the thread "unveiling the new wallhacks", here is some evidence of how these guys could have been hacking and not get banned, and a great example of what they probably used. 
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: nfk on September 22, 2010, 02:07:14 PM
Everyone who says its not cheating is getting played, ive used hacks in counterstrike that would do the same thing.  If its not cheating, teach me how to accurately shoot in a hole from a 100 yrds away in the case of airtime.  Thanks and youre all getting played.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: flip on September 22, 2010, 04:43:55 PM
could havecould have been hacking  and a great example of what they probably used.  

That is the whole issue.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: gonass on September 22, 2010, 08:01:22 PM
seeing the video of one of shk's demos with the "currently used" wall hacks makes me think even more that shk uses them.  happy now flip?
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: MyeRs on September 24, 2010, 02:28:15 PM
Just an FYI to committee members [since most of the community wont know what this means] -- Cullent has been enabled on all GG servers for over 3 weeks now. [And it does not get removed after league matches, so its always enabled on [ x ] match servers].

EDIT: I was told a lot of people don't know what Cullent is, basically it is a wallhack prevention.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: Olbaid on September 24, 2010, 03:20:15 PM
If this is true, it apparently doesn't work.  I watched someone match on an [ x ] server less than 2 weeks ago, and he openly admitted he was wall hacking.

EDIT:  "And cullent doesn't prevent wall hacking, it only makes it work less good." -From the wall hacker himself
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: jitspoe on September 26, 2010, 12:00:34 AM
Vemo video is dead now, but I watched the demo.  I didn't really see many moments that looked like potential wall hacks.  Half the time, he'd be aiming/spraying on the wrong side of a box, where it would have been an easy kill with a wallhack.  What I did find odd, though, is how frequently he shot his teammates when his crosshair passed over them.  It seemed like he spent most of the match deliberately looking at the ground/turning away/jumping/whatever to avoid putting his crosshair on a teammate.

Here are the suspicious moments that stood out to me:

14 seconds before match starts - cursor looks like it locks to teammate's back and shoots
17:15 - turns away from enemy base to teammmates and shoots them when there couldn't have possibly been enemies there
15:22
12:25 - shoots teammates in base and spazzes back and forth between them
10:39 - shoots teammate in back
6:13 - shoots his teammate as soon as his crosshair passes over him
3:52 - crosshair pops up and he fires at his teammate, then starts shooting at the ground to pretend he was messing around?

On a side note, this demo had the potential to be far more entertaining if the league was run like most serious gaming leagues and had friendly fire enabled.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: Justinph5 on September 26, 2010, 12:21:23 PM
And 15:03 - he shoots his teammates back after coming around the corner. :P

Hadn't watched this one yet until now. Don't know how true that Cullent is on x's servers, but it doesn't protect against those. I'll have 2 new aimbots in my hands tomorrow, will see if this and other demos can be replicated. Guess I need to make sure it has autofire too. ;)
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: cusoman on September 26, 2010, 01:06:29 PM
Serverside entity culling may decrease the effectiveness of the wallhacks themselves, but it also makes wallhacking easier to hide.  The players would only be shown through walls when the server definitely thinks you are about to see them, making it easier to play normally nearly all the time and still know where the enemy is before the enemy knows where you are.  Food for thought.  I have no direct opinion on any of the current hackusations or theories plaguing the forums.

- Cusoman
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: CheMiCal on September 27, 2010, 01:21:22 AM
so now you think he aimbots, wow this is unbelivable. just wow.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: gonass on September 27, 2010, 05:22:25 PM
i also think he uses a speed hack with his speed just slightly turned up, if you're wanting to keep track of the list chem.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: Henrod on September 27, 2010, 08:29:53 PM
i also think he uses a speed hack with his speed just slightly turned up, if you're wanting to keep track of the list chem.

Doubt it, he gets plenty of air off his jumps, speed hacks typically keep you a bit lower than normal.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: gonass on September 28, 2010, 12:17:05 PM
how so? i thought the principal was the greater your speed the higher a jump from a ramp.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: CheMiCal on September 28, 2010, 12:52:17 PM
you drop faster with speed hacks so it looks like you get less airtime. stupid
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: joonas on September 28, 2010, 01:57:08 PM
Only uninformed. Using a speedhack is the same as fastforwarding a video.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: Rick on September 28, 2010, 05:31:58 PM
I personally have speedhacked before and I have to say, depending on your settings, the slope of your jump can be drastically changed.
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: gonass on October 02, 2010, 12:03:24 PM
you drop faster with speed hacks so it looks like you get less airtime. stupid
sorry,i havent used a speed hack before. but i take it you have?
Title: Re: Hackusation: shk
Post by: CheMiCal on October 04, 2010, 12:56:08 AM
nah just seen it from muffs zpar incident