Author Topic: Is this normal looking  (Read 2210 times)

loial21

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2807
Is this normal looking
« on: May 31, 2007, 03:26:38 PM »
http://zilla-clan.net/upload/016302



Explain how this is normal please so I can feel good.

magalhaes

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1256
Re: Is this normal looking
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2007, 03:44:29 PM »
Cant that be just lag?

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: Is this normal looking
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2007, 06:21:05 PM »
Looks like he just has really bad packet loss.  He's not moving faster than anybody else, just really choppy.

loial21

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2807
Re: Is this normal looking
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2007, 09:05:05 PM »
Is this type of consistant packet loss with no ping spikes normal? His ping never went of 130 or under 90.

If it was his ISP normally there would be fluxing of ping and or warping and visable 'freezing'. Thats what I get when I have anykind of packetloss.

Are there settings in the console that could cause this?

Thank you both for looking at this.



Chef-Killer

  • Map Committee
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1312
Re: Is this normal looking
« Reply #4 on: June 01, 2007, 05:13:58 AM »
I think ping is normal, i have lots of packetloss if there are more than 6 players on the server (other post under help or so). Then i realy lag, or i have a standig picture, but my ping stays on 30-35.

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: Is this normal looking
« Reply #5 on: June 01, 2007, 12:13:38 PM »
He could be on a shared network connection and/or be downloading things while playing.

Smokey

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1172
Re: Is this normal looking
« Reply #6 on: June 01, 2007, 03:41:09 PM »
File Bandwith Used: 19.35 Mb
File Size: 1.02 Mb


How does that work? 1.02 doesn't divide evenly into 19.35 at all..
19.35 / 1.02 = 18.9705882
How the hell did that happen..

y00tz

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2742
Re: Is this normal looking
« Reply #7 on: June 01, 2007, 04:58:40 PM »
If someone starts downloading the file then cancels, bandwidth is used..

But it could also be estimated or approximated.

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: Is this normal looking
« Reply #8 on: June 01, 2007, 06:15:08 PM »
There's also overhead in the packet headers, packet loss causing packets to be re-sent, etc, and it could be measuring up and down bandwidth, maybe?

loial21

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2807
Re: Is this normal looking
« Reply #9 on: June 02, 2007, 06:04:48 AM »
Ass ump tions.

:(

KnacK

  • Global Moderator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 3039
Re: Is this normal looking
« Reply #10 on: June 02, 2007, 08:01:04 AM »
Are they measuring bytes as 1000 bits or 1024 bits ?

y00tz

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2742
Re: Is this normal looking
« Reply #11 on: June 02, 2007, 10:00:06 AM »
Are they measuring bytes as 1000 bits or 1024 bits ?

I had considered this, and did the math, and it didn't come out.

Smokey

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1172
Re: Is this normal looking
« Reply #12 on: June 02, 2007, 11:22:24 AM »
it simply takes the filesize, and adds it to the overall bandwidth used when the file is downloaded, so it should always divide evenly.

y00tz

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2742
Re: Is this normal looking
« Reply #13 on: June 02, 2007, 01:26:31 PM »
See, right now it's at;
File Bandwith Used: 22.4 Mb
File Size: 1.02 Mb
File Downloaded: 22 times

and  22 x 1.02 = 22.44.

File Bandwith Used: 19.35 Mb
File Size: 1.02 Mb


How does that work? 1.02 doesn't divide evenly into 19.35 at all..
19.35 / 1.02 = 18.9705882
How the hell did that happen..

Perhaps someone was just downloading it at the time? :)