Author Topic: Photography...  (Read 151661 times)

S8NSSON

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 709
Re: Photography...
« Reply #700 on: June 24, 2009, 10:32:14 AM »
I think digital imaging has made the art of photography limitless. There is so much less pressure to get it all perfect for the shot. You can do so much in post production today.

I shoot everything in RAW. I have actually talked several pro photographers into shooting in RAW. How they didn't do it already was beyond me. Non-destructive manipulation rules.

wafflez205

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 275
Re: Photography...
« Reply #701 on: June 24, 2009, 11:40:42 AM »
Aren't RAW files huge? Or is that TIF? Ah I'm confused

S8NSSON

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 709
Re: Photography...
« Reply #702 on: June 24, 2009, 12:15:55 PM »
RAW files are huge.

Actually RAW files are not much larger than the highest resolution JPGs coming out of your camera.

The beauty of RAW files is that you can alter the sharpness, brightness, contrast, white balance, shadows, highlights, and cropping non-destructive. The "recipe" is stored in the RAW file and applied in the software that handles the RAW images. You simply export to JPG and into Photoshop to apply any destructive effects you want on the image.

One of the first rules I learned was to ALWAYS shoot at your camera's maximum resolution. You never know when you will snap that perfect picture you wish to print at 8.5x11 or larger. If you only have the picture in a smaller resolution you would be pretty mad.

Memory, HD space, and backup schemes are so inexpensive today.
I just bought a 1TB USB2.0 drive for backups. I've been shooting 10MB RAW files for the last two years and have accumulated around 200gigs of images. That 1TB drive should last me a good three or four more years.

coLa

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1178
Re: Photography...
« Reply #703 on: June 24, 2009, 10:41:42 PM »
I ALWAYS shoot in RAW. :]]]

UDead

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 592
Re: Photography...
« Reply #704 on: June 25, 2009, 05:38:57 AM »
How much memory to you have and your camera holds, raw eats up a memory care quick

So what’s different form shooting at highest setting resolution or dpi (dots per inch) verses raw? I use my highest resolution settings and bring it into Photoshop and edit them.

S8NSSON

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 709
Re: Photography...
« Reply #705 on: June 25, 2009, 08:14:21 AM »
I have an 8gig and two 4gig cards. At around 10MB per pic I can fit just under 800 RAW pics on on the 8gig card.
Rarely ever do I completely fill the 8gig card in a single outing.

The difference between RAW and same resolution JPG? I just covered that above.

coLa

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1178
Re: Photography...
« Reply #706 on: June 25, 2009, 08:42:50 AM »
Think I have a 4gig card and can hold about 400 pictures.

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: Photography...
« Reply #707 on: June 25, 2009, 05:42:45 PM »
I've noticed that the effects of image manipulation tend to display artifacts of the camera sensor much faster than jpeg compression artifacts, so RAW doesn't really seem worth it to me in most cases.  I've never had to make substantial changes to an image that were impossible/looked bad due to not having the raw source, plus it's an extra step to go through.  A lot of image viewers don't support raw formats natively.  Memory is super cheap these days, though, so there's probably no harm in doing it.  Max resolution is a must, though.  I wish my camera had a higher resolution (3072x2048).  Though I do have a special low-res mode I use occasionally for generic crap that isn't art photography.

UDead

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 592
Re: Photography...
« Reply #708 on: June 26, 2009, 05:46:51 AM »
My camera highest is 2616 x 2684 but I don’t have one of those high end full digital SLR's, mines just a Fujifilm finepix S9000.

Cameron

  • Global Moderator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2686
Re: Photography...
« Reply #709 on: June 27, 2009, 02:52:32 AM »
Question for Photoshoppers..... Is there any way possible to make the default Save-As option JPEG?  I'm getting sick of having to change that, and Google is no help at all :(.

UDead

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 592
Re: Photography...
« Reply #710 on: June 27, 2009, 05:02:51 AM »
What do you mean as making a default save-as option jpg? I took Photoshop in high school so I need more information on what you want to do.

Cameron

  • Global Moderator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2686
Re: Photography...
« Reply #711 on: June 27, 2009, 05:04:50 AM »
Well, when I go to save a file, if I click save-as it brings up that save-as box right.  It automatically has the photoshop format selected as the save format, and I would like to have that set as .jpg when I click save-as.  Its only 2 seconds of time, but it annoys the hell out of me when I'm doing other things as well.

Justinph5

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1159
Re: Photography...
« Reply #712 on: June 27, 2009, 07:40:28 AM »
Question for Photoshoppers..... Is there any way possible to make the default Save-As option JPEG?  I'm getting sick of having to change that, and Google is no help at all :(.
It defaults based on the file specs. If the file has one layer, it defaults to JPEG. If it has more than one layer, it defaults to PSD. Unless you already had a multi-layer file saved as a different format, then it will resave as that format when you go to save a copy.

So if you're saving as a jpeg, then just flatten the image before you save.  (Ctrl-Shift-E)

S8NSSON

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 709
Re: Photography...
« Reply #713 on: June 27, 2009, 09:53:36 AM »
Three words...

Save For Web

Cameron

  • Global Moderator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2686
Re: Photography...
« Reply #714 on: June 28, 2009, 02:59:16 AM »
Three words...

Save For Web
lol, i later found that out from a friend.   Thanks for the explanation as well Jusu :)

UDead

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 592
Re: Photography...
« Reply #715 on: July 05, 2009, 06:10:56 PM »
Here are some photos I took yesterday of the fireworks and the cars.
















wafflez205

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 275
Re: Photography...
« Reply #716 on: July 05, 2009, 11:53:18 PM »
wow you actually got good photos of fireworks

RoBbIe

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 720
Re: Photography...
« Reply #717 on: July 05, 2009, 11:59:56 PM »
I like the 3rd car. :) ( camaro if im not mistaking, Not 100% positive though, looks like a 69 to, awesome car...)

UDead

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 592
Re: Photography...
« Reply #718 on: July 06, 2009, 04:42:16 AM »
I'm not sure, I have more car photos I didn't show above there.

UDead

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 592
Re: Photography...
« Reply #719 on: July 08, 2009, 11:58:42 AM »
Here are some flower photos I took before I went to see the fireworks.