Since your perception while you watch the demos is as if snood is actually using the wallhack, everything will seem more suspicious and every little awkward thing that happens during a map will be considered wallhacks even though it’s not.
[22:57] <@Austin> i was typing to gonass..
[22:57] <@Austin> becasue look
[22:57] <@Austin> supposedly i was shooting spawn through a wall
[22:57] <@Austin> and following him at 17:30
[22:58] <@Austin> even though i was lining the jump from ice to hi bd
[23:21] <Austin> I might get banned for something completly stupid..
[23:21] <Austin> id dint do antyhing
[23:21] <Austin> wtf
Yes, it was unexpected that Ballers would win the American side of unrated tournament, but its sure not because of hacks. Like shep said, we’ve played as a team for over 2 years together(before I got unbanned I played with shep, then while I was banned shep and snood were teammates for a while) and slowly improving. Most teams haven’t been complaining that we hack during the actual tournament, they complained about how much we camped (which was what led us to win). I think people are just upset that they lost to Ballers, a team that shouldn’t of done this good and are expressing their anger on the forums by accusing us of hacking, because skill clearly wasn’t a part of our game today, right? I’m curious why none of us were accused of hacking during the actual tournament but only after we beat you, this all started.
Anyays, although this thread is meant for the whole Ballers clan, it seems as if though it’s being directed towards snoods “AWKWARD” or “COINCIDENCIAL” shot. Just because you have the idea that we hack, when you watch the demos, every tiny little thing is automatically predicted as if it was wallhacks…You should review these demos in a matter where you don’t think we are hacking, and think of it based as if it was just luck (which it was)……
These little suspicious moments that are barely obvious and made into huge discussions are pretty annoying. Just because you saw one coincidence in a demo does not mean he is using wallhacks. It’s pretty hard to not be obvious if you use wallhacks (I know because I’ve used them before). Clearly none of us were suspicious at one point throughout all these demo requests made today except that “COINCIDENCIAL” moment by snood which caught everyone’s attention and is now being debated on whether its wallhacks or not.
Let me tell you this: If I really wanted to hack in DP or distribute hacks to anybody, or cover a ‘hackers’ back, I wouldn’t of went through all of the time, and process, and waiting and MSG’ing with jitspoe… I would of just evaded my ban and made a new account…. I wouldn’t of waited 3 months to play DP again and hack.. I mean, it’s pretty self-explanatory. I’m not covering snoods back because he asked me to, I just feel as if though this is getting out of hand by accusing him of hacking just because of that coincidencial moment which was a total fluke. You need to change your perspective when you watch a "hackers" demo and watch it in a way as if though he isn’t using hacks and is playing fair (like we are right now), otherwise when you watch the demos in a point of view as if he is actually walling, every little suspicious moment, will be taken as if it was wallhacks. Also, almost everyday when I match, I have a demo request.. I thought about it and I feel as if though I have to play bad on purpose in order not to get a demo request.. That is pretty pathetic. But I hope you understand. I'm not trying to make a ragefest just making a point.
