Lekky, cut the BS. You know my idea for a committee is a lot more fairer of a process than the current one. 10 members should not be able to make a good decission when there is so much group think and friendships to worry about. I'm not saying best committee can be picked, I'm saying at least a fair committee.
And furthermore, you sit here and try to tell me I'm just trying to make a name for myself, or throw around shi.t? I've been around this game WAY longer than you, and have a fraction of your posts. I rarely post on here, only when I see something going on that I feel is wrong, and given the current state, I think, along with many others, that some of the stuff that has been going on is BS. You're the only one I see trying to make a name for themselves. Knack offered some constructive criticism to the matter, to which I responded. You sit here and act like the committee is perfect the way it is, it would be the same people, and all this stuff, while trying to downplay my system, because I'm "trying to make a name for myself."
Lekky, I don't need to make a name for myself. I will always be better at this game then most the people that play and I will always be more intelligent than the majority of people that play this game. It's rare occasions like this, where I step in, with what is wrong, what is causing a divide, and what can be done to help people feel like justice has been served, because whether or not the current committee is doing things justly, people feel they aren't.
Jitspoe asked for a suggestion, I gave him one, a pretty good one, if you get people that want to be on the committee for the right reasons, then my plan would work great. People like you, who feel the need to put people down and comment on every little thing in a way that attempts to belittle people, are the exact people that shouldn't be on a new committee.
