Author Topic: Sharing Cheats: KiLo (Read 47378 times)

wafflez205 · « **Reply #60 on:** February 11, 2008, 08:33:27 PM »

well one person hax and gets 32 or 64 days. kilo shares hacks and gets banned for almost 3 YEARS! ITS WRONG IN MY EYES! Kilo helped my clan start out by helping me with an irc channel (thx to flame as well) Kilo is a good guy i dont think the committe should have banned him for almost 3 years. its wrong. just plain wrong

KiLo · « **Reply #61 on:** February 11, 2008, 08:41:20 PM »

I love how everyone thinks this is way to harsh yet the committee is to meddling retarded notice their own mistake.

wafflez205 · « **Reply #62 on:** February 11, 2008, 08:49:30 PM »

Quote from: KiLo on February 11, 2008, 08:41:20 PM

I love how everyone thinks this is way to harsh yet the committee is to meddling retarded notice their own mistake.

most committees are

Riddick · « **Reply #63 on:** February 11, 2008, 09:19:07 PM »

sadly i would have to agree with kilo on the ban time. thats way to long for what he did.

KiLo · « **Reply #64 on:** February 11, 2008, 09:26:16 PM »

Quote from: OnSlaught on February 11, 2008, 09:19:07 PM

sadly i would have to agree with kilo on the ban time. thats way to long for what he did. and on a side note. when is muff being banned?

Thank you. And nice on the last question there.

SmPeR · « **Reply #65 on:** February 11, 2008, 09:38:03 PM »

KiLo is awesome and all... but i gotta come out and say it..

PWNED..

im sorry.. the ban time is wayy wayy to long.. i agree with kilo.. the most should be around 500 days.. c'mon!

wafflez205 · « **Reply #66 on:** February 11, 2008, 09:41:19 PM »

no it should be at the most 64

SmPeR · « **Reply #67 on:** February 11, 2008, 09:44:59 PM »

well the only reason i see 64 is because he didnt use them.. but hes the only one saying he didnt.

KiLo · « **Reply #68 on:** February 11, 2008, 09:46:41 PM »

You can ask jitspoe if I did considering everything in that pack is detected.

SmPeR · « **Reply #69 on:** February 11, 2008, 09:51:20 PM »

i beleive you.. its just not everybody does.

wafflez205 · « **Reply #70 on:** February 11, 2008, 09:53:18 PM »

1024 is way way WAY too muc hfor just sharing a couple of detectable hax that he didnt even use

Eiii · « **Reply #71 on:** February 11, 2008, 10:06:42 PM »

Quote from: wafflez205 on February 11, 2008, 09:53:18 PM

1024 is way way WAY too muc hfor just sharing a couple of detectable hax that he didnt even use

No, it's not. Distributing hacks is considerably worse than using them. It's really a shame we're losing kilo, but that's what you get for dealing with hacks and such. It's not acceptable.

wafflez205 · « **Reply #72 on:** February 11, 2008, 10:12:41 PM »

still it wuz a detectable hack and if the ppl downloaded it they probably didnt know how to use it

KiLo · « **Reply #73 on:** February 11, 2008, 10:27:26 PM »

I look at myself as more of a crime fighter. If people really want to hack then give them the hacks and let them get banned. We don't need them anyway.

wafflez205 · « **Reply #74 on:** February 11, 2008, 10:30:43 PM »

Quote from: KiLo on February 11, 2008, 10:27:26 PM

I look at myself as more of a crime fighter. If people really want to hack then give them the hacks and let them get banned. We don't need them anyway.

EXACTLY!!

Nitroboy · « **Reply #75 on:** February 11, 2008, 10:56:33 PM »

Quote from: KiLo on February 11, 2008, 10:27:26 PM

I look at myself as more of a crime fighter. If people really want to hack then give them the hacks and let them get banned. We don't need them anyway.

Quoted For Truth!!!

I think that 1024 days is way to long, 2.8 years for a a pack of hacks that if people used, they would be banned anyways. I can see why the committee would make a ban for 1024 days, but he never used any of them, and if anybody downloaded the pack, and used it, they would be banned anyways. 1024 days is just too long for something that is kind of like a mouse trap for people with an incentive to hack.

wafflez205 · « **Reply #76 on:** February 11, 2008, 11:27:36 PM »

That is exactly how it is. Come on committee half of the community is wanting this ban lifted why dont you do anything about it

KiLo · « **Reply #77 on:** February 11, 2008, 11:44:35 PM »

I don't even want the ban lifted. I understand that I did something wrong and I am willing to accept a ban. Just not one that is overly ridiculous like this one.

War · « **Reply #78 on:** February 11, 2008, 11:47:41 PM »

The ban should be no more then 64 days. Seeing he didn't use them. and i think a majority of the downloads was b/c some1 posted on the forums about it being their, Which helped advertise it.

wafflez205 · « **Reply #79 on:** February 11, 2008, 11:53:22 PM »

Quote from: War on February 11, 2008, 11:47:41 PM

The ban should be no more then 64 days. Seeing he didn't use them. and i think a majority of the downloads was b/c some1 posted on the forums about it being their, Which helped advertise it.

exactly true. 2 years is way too much considering he didnt use them