Author Topic: My Ban tim (Read 21457 times)

MuFFDiVeR · « **Reply #20 on:** February 12, 2008, 06:18:27 PM »

"Your ban time should be the same as carcoals, assuming you're still banning carcoal. No point of having a thread about the same offense."

this is a very good point i agree with this but on a side note, i believe that carcoal already got a slap on the wrist a year ago when this took place because he went directly to jit's a day later and told him he just wanted to see what it look like. Its a shame carcaol works too much and doesn't have time to clear things up with the committee and public. i hope the committee can get a reach of him before their decision is made.

Clipz · « **Reply #21 on:** February 12, 2008, 06:39:49 PM »

lmao i hacked like 3 years ago and there was no global ban then

jitspoe · « **Reply #22 on:** February 12, 2008, 10:17:59 PM »

Kind of strange how most of the votes are at either extreme.

Eiii · « **Reply #23 on:** February 12, 2008, 10:20:36 PM »

It's either "WTF <3 WULFIE" or "OMG BAN NOW 4EVAR"

Termin8oR · « **Reply #24 on:** February 12, 2008, 10:30:34 PM »

Voted 0, justice cannot be served on this.

This game is going to die really quick with 10 people banned a day.

Y2J · « **Reply #25 on:** February 13, 2008, 12:13:26 AM »

Quote from: jitspoe on February 12, 2008, 10:17:59 PM

Kind of strange how most of the votes are at either extreme.

Goes to show bias' people have. some community members would NEVER ban uni that long, because they think he is great. While others would love nothing more than to see him gone for a lifetime. And should he commit an offense that is warranted of the latter ruling? You can rest assured those committee members that wouldn't ban him lifetime would come up with something like his map contributions show more effort than other cheaters, etc. While other members may say on a slighter charge, it's time to step it up and get rid of him.

The problem with a publicly elected committee and a private board is that the people have no way of telling who the extremist are and who the sound people are. At least give us the voting records and discussions of given topics of the committee, if you keep it publicly elected. That way when/if reelections come up, people have something to base votes off of.

loial21 · « **Reply #26 on:** February 13, 2008, 12:51:22 AM »

Hard code this game.

y00tz · « **Reply #27 on:** February 13, 2008, 01:10:55 AM »

Quote from: loial21 on February 13, 2008, 12:51:22 AM

Hard code this game.

No, please.

Eiii · « **Reply #28 on:** February 13, 2008, 01:34:08 AM »

Let's also force everyone's latency to be that of the highest-pinging player in the match to force fairness.

WarWulf · « **Reply #29 on:** February 13, 2008, 02:11:03 AM »

heh this thread is exciting :3 i asked y2j what he voted for me but didnt respond =/ well he is an er33t member im sure he wants me gone talk about being bias ^^ <3 y2j

just ask s8n how bias i was when dirtytaco was multi accounting lol

Re · « **Reply #30 on:** February 13, 2008, 02:27:15 AM »

Rick · « **Reply #31 on:** February 13, 2008, 02:30:29 AM »

0, hands down.

Y2J · « **Reply #32 on:** February 13, 2008, 09:51:29 AM »

Quote from: WarWulf on February 13, 2008, 02:11:03 AM

heh this thread is exciting :3 i asked y2j what he voted for me but didnt respond =/ well he is an er33t member im sure he wants me gone talk about being bias ^^ <3 y2j

just ask s8n how bias i was when dirtytaco was multi accounting lol

I didn't see you ask what I voted for anywhere... And if you mean on IRC my PC probably restarted before I saw it.

I voted 1024, not cause I feel you should get 1024, but because it keeps the count close. Frankly, if Carcoal is getting banned for hacking years ago, I feel it sets the standard you should get banned for 32 days, or however many he got banned for. Had carcoal not been banned, then I would definitely say no ban for you, but a standard has been set by someone to ban people for hacking years ago.

WarWulf · « **Reply #33 on:** February 13, 2008, 12:21:36 PM »

Quote from: Y2J on February 13, 2008, 09:51:29 AM

I didn't see you ask what I voted for anywhere... And if you mean on IRC my PC probably restarted before I saw it.

I voted 1024, not cause I feel you should get 1024, but because it keeps the count close.

I feel it sets the standard you should get banned for 32 days

how very unbias of you *notes a bit of sarcasum* you vote for 1024 yet you only want me banned for 32 days

Magical-Tree · « **Reply #34 on:** February 13, 2008, 12:27:06 PM »

Vote 0. It's in the past. =

Olbaid · « **Reply #35 on:** February 13, 2008, 12:37:31 PM »

I vote 32 only because carcoal got banned for 32 days.

lekky · « **Reply #36 on:** February 13, 2008, 01:00:17 PM »

the whole idea of banning past crimes with new punishments is fuc.king ridiculous btw...

WarWulf · « **Reply #37 on:** February 13, 2008, 01:07:43 PM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7j2DHUw8SZg

Kaos · « **Reply #38 on:** February 13, 2008, 01:46:01 PM »

too long ago to worry about be4 cheat detection my vote = 0

James · « **Reply #39 on:** February 13, 2008, 02:25:39 PM »

From what I gather there shouldn't even be a poll for this. You're either banned like carcoal for the same amount of time, or you're not banned and neither is carcoal. The committee didn't vote for carcoal, Jitspoe just upright banned him for 32 days.

The options should be.

A) The topic should be banned for offenses done in the past.

B) Shouldn't be a poll for this and you should just be banned.

C) Don't be banned and carcoals lifted.

Poll

My Ban Time Length

Author Topic: My Ban tim (Read 21457 times)