Author Topic: Photography... (Read 151627 times)

KnacK · « **Reply #500 on:** March 02, 2009, 02:31:53 PM »

Keith,

Here's a pic that you need to try.

For teh record: I'm a HUGE fan of B/W.

Take a shot of your daughter in color, the in photoshop strip all of the color out except her eyes. That would be the money shot.

On a side note: I'd hate to be you when she starts liking boys......

Playah · « **Reply #501 on:** March 02, 2009, 02:48:52 PM »

I'd rather not expose too many pics of my own daughter on the internet.

S8NSSON · « **Reply #502 on:** March 02, 2009, 03:52:59 PM »

Quote from: Playah on March 02, 2009, 02:48:52 PM

I'd rather not expose too many pics of my own daughter on the internet.

I don't mind showing some nice shots of my daughter.
What you won't see or hear is anything about my guns and various defensive and offensive devices and such.

lilb990 · « **Reply #503 on:** March 02, 2009, 04:51:25 PM »

Quote from: S8NSSON on March 02, 2009, 03:52:59 PM

What you won't see or hear is anything about my guns and various defensive and offensive devices and such.

Hehehe not even a sneak peek?

Justinph5 · « **Reply #504 on:** March 04, 2009, 02:24:58 PM »

^ looks like he's one to watch out for.

wanting to find out what protection you have.

(although, seeing Fl1p's kids with guns makes me want to stay out of Colorado. LOL)

coLa · « **Reply #505 on:** March 04, 2009, 11:31:22 PM »

I got my equipment in earlier than expected. WOOT. Just need to order the last flash. :]]]

KnacK · « **Reply #506 on:** March 05, 2009, 07:31:33 AM »

OK.

I just got ALL of mt father's pictures that he took before he passed away. He was an avid photographer and was published in a boat load of magazines, typically related to the outdoors.

I am looking for a good quality flatbed scanner and a slide/negative scanner so I can get these things digitised and share with you.

Any thoughts?

S8NSSON · « **Reply #507 on:** March 05, 2009, 11:35:05 AM »

I don't use a scanner. I just take a picture of any pictures I have with my camera.

S8NSSON · « **Reply #508 on:** March 05, 2009, 03:33:27 PM »

Some more macro stuff...

jitspoe · « **Reply #509 on:** March 05, 2009, 03:53:26 PM »

Looks like you're getting a pretty broad depth of field now. What settings are you using?

S8NSSON · « **Reply #510 on:** March 05, 2009, 04:12:21 PM »

Well I set my lights up and had my camera on a tripod with a remote shutter cable.
This allowed me to shoot at f32 @ 100ISO. The feather tuft is f8, which looks better than the f32 version because at f32 too many feathers were in focus.

All of these were with the 50mm on top of the 17-70mm set to 70mm, which is a little better than 1:1.

I'm pleased with it. I tried a few water drops, but my shutter was only at 1/50 which is WAY too slow.

I need to test the 50mm on top of my 70-200mm @ 200mm next with this same setup.

Now I just have to wait for the insects to start coming out!!!

jitspoe · « **Reply #511 on:** March 05, 2009, 05:05:27 PM »

When I tried to use high f-values, I got a larger depth of field, but the area that was in focus wasn't nearly as sharp. Have you noticed this, or is it just something with my camera?

S8NSSON · « **Reply #512 on:** March 05, 2009, 06:46:59 PM »

There might be a little softness in them.
The 40D has Live View which allows you to look through the LCD, zoom in 10x, and manual focus to great precision. Seems to work good.

Here's the full size image and XIF to look at.

http://kcharron.net/stuff/IMG_9610_full.jpg

Code: [Select]

          IMG_9610.CR2
Camera Model Name
          Canon EOS 40D
Firmware
          Firmware Version 1.0.8
Shooting Date/Time
          3/4/2009 17:52:10
Tv(Shutter Speed)
          1/10Sec.
Av(Aperture Value)
          F32
Metering Modes
          Evaluative metering
Exposure Compensation
          0
ISO Speed
          100
Lens
          17-50mm
Focal Length
          50.0 mm
Image size
          3888 x 2592
Image Quality
          RAW
Flash
          Off
White Balance
          Auto
AF mode
          Manual (MF)
Picture Style
          Standard
Parameters
          Tone Curve :    Standard
          Sharpness level :    -
          Pattern Sharpness :    -
          Contrast :    0
          Sharpness :    3
          Color saturation :    0
          Color tone :    0
          Long exposure noise reduction :    Disable
          High ISO speed noise reduction :    Disable
          Highlight tone priority :    Disable
Color matrix
          -
Color Space
          sRGB
File Size
          9902 KB
Dust Delete Data
          No
Drive Mode
          High-speed continuous shooting
GPS Data
          Satellite signal status :    -
          Date(UTC) :    -
          Latitude :    -
          Longitude :    -
          Altitude :    -
          Geographic coordinate system :    -
Owner's Name
          -
Camera Body No.
          1320719581

coLa · « **Reply #513 on:** March 09, 2009, 11:27:38 PM »

Using the wireless stuff and flash, along with the vertical grip. Still waiting for the other flash to come in. Should be here this week.

Feeding time... :]]]

coLa · « **Reply #514 on:** March 11, 2009, 10:57:56 PM »

Some more...

Not sure how I feel about these. My flash started losing power midway through, so I bounced the light off a wall to the immediate left.

Maybe B&W conversion would make it a bit better, or is it just complete fail?

S8NSSON · « **Reply #515 on:** March 12, 2009, 05:34:10 AM »

I see nothing?

KnacK · « **Reply #516 on:** March 12, 2009, 05:47:06 AM »

ok Schultzie

coLa · « **Reply #517 on:** March 12, 2009, 07:05:38 AM »

KnacK · « **Reply #518 on:** March 12, 2009, 08:13:14 AM »

Quote from: S8NSSON on March 12, 2009, 05:34:10 AM

I see nothing?

S8NSSON · « **Reply #519 on:** March 20, 2009, 09:39:02 AM »

Ah work must be blocking the site you host those images on Cola.
Nice snake!

Here's my attempt at catching the contact of a golf club with the ball last week...

Yes, that is I. Notice the club flexing forward at the moment of contact. Can anyone guess where this ball is going?