Author Topic: FEATURE REQUESTS  (Read 39873 times)

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #240 on: November 28, 2005, 06:59:44 PM »
For server in windows, can we have a command like newmap because map doesnt accept dm or ctf or ...
I'm not sure, but it may be possible to use the newmap command with the sv command, for example, "sv newmap midnight 1flag".  If not, I can add that in there.  Currently you have to set the "ctfmode" variable to select the gamemode you want.  If you're starting a listen server, you can simply select this from the menu.  If you're doing it at the console and the sv newmap command doesn't work, here are the ctfmode settings:

set ctfmode -1 // standard elimination
set ctfmode 0  // deathmatch
set ctfmode 1  // whiteflag/centerflag/1-flag ctf
set ctfmode 2  // standard ctf (one or more flags/bases per team)
set ctfmode 3  // Siege mode.
set ctfmode 4  // KOTH (king of the hill) mode.
default: 2

FreudDu31

  • Stingray
  • Posts: 89
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #241 on: November 29, 2005, 01:42:51 AM »
"sv newmap midnight 1flag" doesnt work
Thanks for info

b00nlander

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 784
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #242 on: November 29, 2005, 02:57:27 PM »
whats the difference in "standard elimination" and "deathmatch"?  Will you not respawn in "standard elim"?

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #243 on: November 29, 2005, 04:19:34 PM »
It's just standard style paintball with no flags.  You get a point for eliminating the other team.  That's it.  Respawns are the same as ctf mode (whatever the "elim" cvar is set to).

FreudDu31

  • Stingray
  • Posts: 89
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #244 on: November 30, 2005, 02:50:14 AM »
Can we assign a result of a function like topspeed to a variable?

Eiii

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 4595
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #245 on: November 30, 2005, 09:06:05 AM »
Quake scripting isn't that good.

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #246 on: November 30, 2005, 12:33:24 PM »
Can we assign a result of a function like topspeed to a variable?
What purpose would that serve?

FreudDu31

  • Stingray
  • Posts: 89
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #247 on: November 30, 2005, 01:03:09 PM »
Can we assign a result of a function like topspeed to a variable?
What purpose would that serve?
To say it for example or to store it (best speed)

nXe

  • Stingray
  • Posts: 94
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #248 on: December 28, 2005, 11:51:21 PM »
REQUEST:

An anti-cheat implementation.  I would also like to contact you, personally, about some design issues with menus / HUD / etc... some insight as to potential for those aspects of the game.

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18802
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #249 on: December 29, 2005, 01:11:50 AM »
Measures to combat cheating are already being worked on.

Why do the design issues have to be personal?  I think it would be better to start a new thread about it so we can get community feedback.

nXe

  • Stingray
  • Posts: 94
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #250 on: December 29, 2005, 03:34:01 PM »
Nice to know work has begun on anti-cheat features...  I'll work up a lil presentation / thread on revamping design.

dagget

  • PGP
  • Posts: 18
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #251 on: December 29, 2005, 11:11:50 PM »
REQUEST:

One new faster gun.

Eiii

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 4595
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #252 on: December 30, 2005, 12:09:06 AM »
The autococker/automag is good enough already.

Blitz

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 329
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #253 on: January 01, 2006, 08:54:43 PM »
An option to enable automatic demoing, perhaps three options:

a.) automatically demo all maps
b.) automatically demo all maps on a passworded server
c.) off

digi

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 343
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #254 on: January 02, 2006, 01:44:26 PM »
An option to enable automatic demoing, perhaps three options:

a.) automatically demo all maps
b.) automatically demo all maps on a passworded server
c.) off

Agreed. I think it should be forced though, meaning no option to turn it off. This makes it so NO ONE has an excuse to not provide a demo. I think the passworded server option would be good.

Eiii

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 4595
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #255 on: January 02, 2006, 02:01:12 PM »
The problem is, that would be a lot of demos after 1month of play. And demos are pretty big...

digi

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 343
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #256 on: January 02, 2006, 02:12:18 PM »
They're not big at all. Full map is like a meg? It will only demo during matches and I highly doubt people are playing like 500 matches a month. Also, they can easily be deleted.. If someone suspects you're cheating they'll ask for your demo right after the match.. You can delete demos 2-3days after. So unless people only have 300mb HD's I dont see why it would be a problem.
« Last Edit: January 06, 2006, 02:51:52 AM by digi »

Murdock

  • PGP
  • Posts: 37
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #257 on: January 02, 2006, 07:03:54 PM »
So unless people only have 300gb HD's I dont see why it would be a problem.

I'm hoping you meant 300MB HDDs.. in any case, my 40GB sucks.

Blitz

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 329
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #258 on: January 05, 2006, 05:41:06 PM »
Or perhaps start deleting them after 2 weeks etc. (if wanted) / or an option for that (much like internet history and such).. in order to keep down on space issues.

digi

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 343
Re: FEATURE REQUESTS
« Reply #259 on: January 06, 2006, 02:49:56 AM »
I'm hoping you meant 300MB HDDs..

hah, yeah, obviously. ;)

my bad