Author Topic: Official Feature Vote of 2007 (Read 234052 times)

Cobo · « **Reply #1000 on:** October 30, 2007, 05:53:42 PM »

IM NUMBER 1000!

y00tz · « **Reply #1001 on:** October 30, 2007, 10:46:21 PM »

I should delete that post, since it's way off-topic but since I haven't seen you on in a while, it lives.

+1 for whatever we're calling the XBain thing...

Termin8oR · « **Reply #1002 on:** October 30, 2007, 11:37:32 PM »

Quote from: Eiii on October 29, 2007, 10:27:10 PM

Seconded.

Also:
Hardware bans
Vote kick
New sounds

I agree with all 3.

magalhaes · « **Reply #1003 on:** October 31, 2007, 06:45:31 AM »

Quote from: Zorchenhimer on October 30, 2007, 05:49:48 PM

Thats just listing the players, not requiring them to login.

. . . I was telling him to do that so he could see that 80% of the players in pubs do not login, so it's an horrible i dea right now.

KiLo · « **Reply #1004 on:** October 31, 2007, 07:08:56 AM »

It's not a horrible idea. Look at it this way if 80% of people don't login then what the intercourse is the point in even having a login system. Just require login and and actually put the login server to good use.

magalhaes · « **Reply #1005 on:** October 31, 2007, 07:43:42 AM »

Yeah, they should log in, but they dont know how. That would make this game lose like 80% of the people who plays it.

Zorchenhimer · « **Reply #1006 on:** October 31, 2007, 11:11:53 AM »

Allot of other games require an account to play. ET:QW, for example, requires you to register before you can even see the server list in-game. Same thing with WarRock. If people can figure out how to register there, then they should be able to do it in DP too.

XtremeBain · « **Reply #1007 on:** October 31, 2007, 11:42:54 AM »

Quote from: Zorchenhimer on October 31, 2007, 11:11:53 AM

Allot of other games require an account to play. ET:QW, for example, requires you to register before you can even see the server list in-game. Same thing with WarRock. If people can figure out how to register there, then they should be able to do it in DP too.

Zorch, If you want, and when I get a chance; I'll split off this thread to another to discuss implementing an in-game registration system. You in? Also PM me your requirements for your silly menu widget variables.

Zorchenhimer · « **Reply #1008 on:** October 31, 2007, 11:45:43 AM »

Quote from: XtremeBain on October 31, 2007, 11:42:54 AM

Zorch, If you want, and when I get a chance; I'll split off this thread to another to discuss implementing an in-game registration system. You in? Also PM me your requirements for your silly menu widget variables.

Sure thing. I'll PM you today sometime.

Edit: Almost forgot. I'm all for an in-game registering system.

Re-Edit:
+1 for Team Death Match

Xena · « **Reply #1009 on:** October 31, 2007, 05:53:08 PM »

a vote to the team deathmatch!

QueeNiE · « **Reply #1010 on:** October 31, 2007, 06:13:57 PM »

+1 team deathmatch

jitspoe · « **Reply #1011 on:** November 01, 2007, 04:19:05 AM »

+1 for password reset: Sunkist

KnacK · « **Reply #1012 on:** November 01, 2007, 04:45:38 AM »

+1 for better dialup support

XtremeBain · « **Reply #1013 on:** November 01, 2007, 06:20:59 AM »

Quote from: KnacK on November 01, 2007, 04:45:38 AM

+1 for better dialup support

I hope you mean 2 player modem to modem multiplayer, like in DOOM.

y00tz · « **Reply #1014 on:** November 01, 2007, 07:10:40 PM »

New Request

Regarding: Global Login, Client, Ponies

I vote we add an in-game and global login website messaging system for the sole purpose of communication between Jitspoe and the Committee, and the average players. This could be used to publish mass-messages such as the release of a new build, or specific messages, for example, why a player has been banned. I propose that the client-side system could either alert players of new messages upon login, or have a built-in client feature to read messages in-game after log in. Discussion took place here: http://dplogin.com/forums/index.php?topic=10109.0;topicseen, with general consensus that this idea wasn't terrible.

I know all of these votes leave a lot to be desired, so I'm not opposed to others discussing this more in-depth in the pre-vote discussion page.

Zorchenhimer · « **Reply #1015 on:** November 01, 2007, 07:11:47 PM »

Quote from: y00tz on November 01, 2007, 07:10:40 PM

New Request

Regarding: Global Login, Client, Ponies

I vote we add an in-game and global login website messaging system for the sole purpose of communication between Jitspoe and the Committee, and the average players. This could be used to publish mass-messages such as the release of a new build, or specific messages, for example, why a player has been banned. I propose that the client-side system could either alert players of new messages upon login, or have a built-in client feature to read messages in-game after log in. Discussion took place here: http://dplogin.com/forums/index.php?topic=10109.0;topicseen, with general consensus that this idea wasn't terrible.

I know all of these votes leave a lot to be desired, so I'm not opposed to others discussing this more in-depth in the pre-vote discussion page.

+1

cusoman · « **Reply #1016 on:** November 01, 2007, 08:00:20 PM »

Heres an idea probably already somewhere on this thing, but i have not read through all of the topic so here it is:
An Auto Update feature that automatically downloads the newest version of DP if a new version is released and you start an old version of DP. This could be done when y00tz's message idea is displayed, which means connecting to some sort of server, it also checks for a variable that determines if a new update is available. if so, then using a preferably HTML download system updates the user's DP files. This could solve the problem of having people with different builds all connecting to a server.
Tell me if you like this idea, if it needs revising, or scratched all together.
-Cusoman
EDIT: + 1 to y00tz's message idea

y00tz · « **Reply #1017 on:** November 01, 2007, 08:08:05 PM »

I'd rather see an 'update my client' option in game, over an auto-updater any day, as would most people I'm sure.

cusoman · « **Reply #1018 on:** November 01, 2007, 08:23:35 PM »

y00tz, do u mean like a button to click on for updating, and if thats what you mean I would totally agree.

-Cusoman
PS: if thats what you mean +1 for that.

y00tz · « **Reply #1019 on:** November 01, 2007, 08:31:48 PM »

I was commenting that I'd rather see an option for updating OVER an auto-updater, it's most likely going to be a lot of coding no matter how you look at it.